Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Banks deal the tip of the iceberg for Australian rugby

  1. #1
    Immortal Contributor The InnFORCEr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West Leederville
    Posts
    16,900
    vCash
    3126000

    Banks deal the tip of the iceberg for Australian rugby

    Georgina Robinson 19 hrs ago

    Test fullback Tom Banks will meet with Wallabies staff in Sydney this week to nut out his future in the wake of a monster $1.4 million per season offer to play in Japan.


    Banks will take advantage of the Brumbies bye week in Super Rugby to sit down with Wallabies management, but it is unlikely there will be a late change of mind on his future.

    The reality of the international rugby economy is that on the one hand, Rugby Australia are asking him to take a pay cut to stay in Canberra while, on the other, a Japanese League One club has the cash to make a 19-Test Wallaby one of the richest players in the world.

    Only Rory Arnold, Australia's sought-after second-rower, will trump Banks in the earning department when his Japanese deal is announced soon.

    RA didn't insult France-based Arnold with a counter-offer when he was on the market before Christmas. With Banks it is different. The Brumbies are desperate to retain their 27-year-old fullback and are still hoping to change his mind.

    To that end, RA have offered Banks a three-year deal with a sabbatical year in which he can bump up his salary with a season in Japan. Unfortunately, they are working within the constraints of a contracting budget that has shrunk by 25 per cent in three years and are offering a downgraded contract.

    As many observers pointed out on Monday, Banks would be mad to stay. "Take the gold and run," was one of the more succinct takes.

    Is this a crisis for Australian rugby? Not yet, but larger forces at play could tip it into one.

    There is no money in the game here and there won't be until the British and Irish Lions tour in 2025, unless RA do a deal with a private equity partner, selling off a portion of the organisation's commercial rights for a cash injection.

    Things could start to ease up if, as expected, Australia are awarded the hosting rights to the 2027 Rugby World Cup. RA boss Andy Marinos floated a $50-60 million windfall from that tournament, but there will be earlier benefits too, from commercial partners willing to kick in more in the lead-up.

    Banks is the latest in a long line of players heading for greener pastures. Reds forwards Lukhan Salakaia-Loto and Angus Scott-Young are headed to Northampton in the UK Premiership, while Rebels and Wallabies hooker Jordan Uelese is also eyeing a move to the UK.

    A hard-nosed look at that crop would note that none of them are players the Wallabies were desperate to keep, but they mattered to their Super clubs.

    In the other column, RA have retained the likes of Jordan Petaia, Izaia Perese, Len Ikitau, James Slipper, the brothers Ryan and Lachlan Lonergan, Hunter Paisami, Darcy Swain and Andrew Kellaway. Kurtley Beale is coming home. If they can sign Reds prop Taniela Tupou on a multi-year deal they will have made their limited money work hard for the Wallabies.

    But Banks's move, expected to be formalised in coming weeks, hurts because it spotlights the harsh reality of Australia's place in the global marketplace, which brings into focus the longer-term question Australian rugby must confront.

    What is the future of SANZAAR, the once-powerful southern hemisphere bloc that dominated consecutive World Cup knockout stages and presented a united front against the powerful and entitled Home Union?

    Later this year RA, New Zealand and Argentina will begin to press their SANZAAR partner South Africa on its intentions beyond 2025, which is when the current Rugby Championship broadcast deal expires.

    All indications are South Africa want into the Six Nations and, despite official statements rejecting such a move, the wishes of the tournament's private equity masters CVC Capital Partners could prove decisive.

    A southern hemisphere bloc without South Africa would be dangerously weak. Financially, because South African broadcasters are the biggest contributors to the rights deal, and on the field in the eyes of jaded fans. Australia and New Zealand will be forced back to the drawing board, which could explain why an annual north vs south Test championship is being pushed hard by SANZAAR.

    As it stands, South Africa's decision has the power to shore up SANZAAR's position - and therefore Rugby Australia's - or plunge it into peril, pushing RA and New Zealand further to the fringes of world rugby's economic and political axis of power.

    A British and Irish Lions tour and a World Cup will be a significant sugar hit in a short space of time, but money alone will not solve all Austrlian rugby's problems, least of all the future of the next Tom Banks.

    https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/more...10b553b7809e74

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?

    Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!

    Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!

  2. #2
    Legend Court Reporter
    Contributor
    James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bridgetown, WA
    Posts
    6,107
    vCash
    22000
    Banks has never impressed at test level. If he wants to stay at an average price, that is fine. Personally, I'd put his money into whichever one ofHarrison and Donaldson wants to play 15, or Petaia.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.

  3. #3
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,535
    vCash
    1324000
    Agreed Jane's, like many of our wallabies, he's a good super rugby player with the right opposition but doesn't bring the goods unternationally

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  4. #4
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,498
    vCash
    504000
    He'd be stupid to turn down that offer

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Similar Threads

  1. Australian Rugby Union signs new $285m television deal
    By travelling_gerry in forum Rugby
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17-12-15, 18:44
  2. Banks Hate Him
    By Happy in forum Jokes
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24-05-15, 11:02
  3. TV deal bails out Australian Rugby
    By beige in forum Rugby
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 17-02-15, 11:25
  4. Lack of an Australian deal angers Edmonds
    By mudskipper in forum ACT Brumbies
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-07-11, 16:48
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-09, 19:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •