Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Tuqiri, ARU settle out of court

  1. #31
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Stade Francais or Bayonne Lote Tuqri will fit right in... the Link at Stade Francais has my money... Lote can enjoy his due rewards in france... good luck to him... the french will love him...

    ---------- Post added at 20:44 ---------- Previous post was at 19:43 ----------

    Neither is the settlement payment tax-free. The ARU yesterday released a statement, which described reports of a $2m payout as ''wildly inaccurate speculation.''


    geeee the ARU paid more...

    ---------- Post added at 21:03 ---------- Previous post was at 20:44 ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by sandgroperrugby View Post
    So I guess you are a Lote lover by the sound of it.

    I would rather the ARU lose money like this then lose money because a high profile player and pin up boy continually brings the game into disrepute. IMHO
    I don't disagree totally but if a contract is to be honored it should also be honored by the ARU... Just look back to last year and the ARU insistence that Gituea honor his faulted Western Australian rugby collective contracts and they fact that failed to back t him as a the player and choose to back the misadministered province speaks volumes... Frankly its pure ARU spin bull-shit... and it doesn't matter what Lote did as it was not illegal... meaning it was within social standards...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #32
    Champion Contributor sandgroperrugby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wattle Grove
    Posts
    2,084
    vCash
    5322000
    Muddy if that is the case then why oh why did he take an out of court settlement?????? If he has nothing to be ashamed or worried about he should have continued the court action and gotten a much bigger sum of money and screwed the ARU for breach of contract. But alas he didn’t, he took an undisclosed amount of money whilst keeping mum on the actual event that broke the camels back. Meanwhile all the players and especially the players union has kept out the media as well regarding this subject.

    Oh yeah if Giteau thought he was being treated unfairly he to could have taken someone to court for breach of contract!! But as the breach was actually a third party sponsorship from a defunct company and the fact that EWF had honoured all contracts they nor the ARU were in contract breach. Third party sponsorships are between the player, players manager and the company willing to put up the money.

    How many smotes do you think you will get for bringing that little nugget up????

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by sandgroperrugby; 28-08-09 at 09:57.
    Generally speaking you aren’t learning much if your lips are moving!!!

  3. #33
    Legend Contributor
    Moderator
    Happy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    JB O'Reilly's
    Posts
    8,172
    vCash
    5000000
    Mudslapper let that fucking firepower / gits horse go will you!! FFS - get some new material!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #34
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,497
    vCash
    504000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    As far as NRL CEO Gallop is concerned, Lote doesn’t have to tell him anything other than it was a contractual difference which was settled. Gallop wont be able to not take Lote back and get one back on Rugby union… EAsy free media for the NRL... watch this space, Gallop is just deflecting the Inglis assault issues in the press…
    Gallop can deny Lote entry to League, the NRL can choose not to register his contract. Whilst what Lote may have done is not illegal and socially acceptable, if it happens while you are out representing the ARU as a Wallaby it is a breach of the player code. If it was the rumour that I have heard from many sources it was a pretty big breach

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #35
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,776
    vCash
    5510000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    Just look back to last year and the ARU insistence that Gituea honor his faulted Western Australian rugby collective contracts and they fact that failed to back t him as a the player and choose to back the misadministered province speaks volumes... Frankly its pure ARU spin bull-shit... and it doesn't matter what Lote did as it was not illegal... meaning it was within social standards...
    FFS. You are getting worse. Apart from your Giteau infatuation and Force obsession, nowdays you don't seem be able to string a reasonably constructed sentence together.

    I have some reservations about such a huge pay out and whether it was really necessary too, but to say..........

    it doesn't matter what Lote did as it was not illegal
    ...................... just shows, once again, what a ridiculous troll you are.

    When there is no indication of the offense how can any sane person say....

    meaning it was within social standards
    .......

    Just say the rumour of a 16yo girl (or something equally unacceptable but legal) were true. That would mean you think that type of behavior is socially acceptable. You have more problems than simply being a troll if that's the case.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  6. #36
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Well I see Force Contracts still incite words here... I agree its past but I'm talking about how the ARU hammers on about contracts and has clearly broken their own with Lote, leaving him with no other choice but to take an acceptable payout... and move on… The fact that it was Giteau is immaterial to me...

    All the gossip gibberish is not qualified by any credible source…

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #37
    (formerly known as Coach) Your Humble Servant Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    14,228
    vCash
    266778
    To me it sounds a lot more like the ARU have clearly enforced their contract with Lote....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Dear Lord, if you give us back Johnny Cash, we'll give you Justin Bieber.

  8. #38
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,497
    vCash
    504000
    Is Lote going overseas to find a club an attempt to keep the story from comming out? As a return to the NRL will apprantly force Lote to come clean

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #39
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    the NRL are only a option to stay in Sydney... when he thinks about it he'll go north for a few years on the big money...

    Coach... I sense the ARU enforced a poor business decision...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. Access denied to Tuqiri court documents - then NOTHING!
    By travelling_gerry in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-08-09, 09:52
  2. Tuqiri sues ARU in NSW Supreme Court
    By travelling_gerry in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-07-09, 06:58
  3. Lote Tuqiri broke Wallabies code
    By travelling_gerry in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-07-09, 22:38
  4. Interest in Tuqiri excites Souths
    By Burgs in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-03-07, 17:57
  5. Tuqiri rejects rugby's offer
    By Burgs in forum Rugby
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-01-07, 10:32

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •