Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Melbourne Victory's Super bid to spark war

  1. #1
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    travelling_gerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    18,483
    vCash
    5098000

    Melbourne Victory's Super bid to spark war

    Wayne Smith | July 10, 2009

    Article from: The Australian

    THE emergence of the Melbourne Victory A-League club as a shock bidder for the Super 15 expansion licence could ignite a battle between the state rugby bodies and the Australian Rugby Union for control of the game.

    Asked yesterday whether he was behind a second Melbourne consortium bidding for the Super 15 licence in opposition to the Victorian Rugby Union, Melbourne Victory owner and chairman Geoff Lord simply replied: "No comment".

    But Lord, the former president of the Hawthorn Football Club, previously has not ruled out branching out into other football codes if Victory's stockholders requested it. And a number of other Melbourne sources have confirmed that Lord is behind the previously undisclosed second Victorian bid.

    The revelation of the Melbourne Victory bid coincided with the resignations yesterday of three members of the seven-person VRU board, Nick Farnan, Glenn Fowles and Craig Dunn over what Farnan described as "governance concerns" with the VRU.

    Earlier this week The Australian revealed disquiet within the VRU that its president, Gary Gray, was being undermined by the ARU, the same body that, in the first instance, will vet expressions of interest to be lodged with it by July 22 before deciding which bids will be asked to make full applications to be submitted to SANZAR on September 18. The winning bid will be announced on October 31.

    Even though Gray was supported last Friday by an 18-0 vote of Victorian club presidents who also empowered him to seek the resignation of dissident directors, the resignation of almost half the VRU board is hardly likely to improve its chances of having the ARU endorse its Super 15 bid.

    The revelation by senior ARU administrator Matt Carroll yesterday that he had met the second Victorian consortium while in Melbourne for the June 20 second Test against Italy has heightened fears within the VRU that the state body could be sidelined.

    "We knew there was a group down there interested," said Carroll who, like ARU chief executive John O'Neill, is well-acquainted with Lord and the Melbourne Victory from the period when they both worked for Football Federation of Australia in setting up the A-League.

    "One would think at the end of the day there's only room for one group coming out of Melbourne."

    There is almost no chance of the VRU inviting Lord into its consortium, or vice versa, although several elements of their bids will overlap, most significantly the fact both plan to play at the new state-of-the-art rectangular stadium that will come online in Melbourne's Olympic precinct next March.

    The Victorian government, which is building the stadium, has been a solid supporter of the VRU bid, but at the end of the day its primary concern is in securing reliable tenants for the new complex.

    The Melbourne Victory operation could easily accommodate a rugby component on top of its soccer program since the A-League is played throughout the summer while the Super 15 will run from February-August.

    Victoria is not the only state rugby union alarmed at the prospect of the national body aligning itself with a private corporation, especially since the ARU has already flagged it intends seriously to investigate private equity ownership models for its other four existing Super 14 franchises.

    Carroll revealed that the licences of all existing Australian Super rugby franchises will expire at the end of next year - when the broadcast agreement runs out. And while logic suggests that the Reds would remain under the control of the Queensland Rugby Union, the Waratahs under the NSWRU, the Brumbies under the ACTRU and the Western Force under Rugby WA, there seemingly would be no impediment to the ARU re-allocating Super 15 licences to private consortiums if it saw the need.

    At the very least, the threat of taking the licences away from them - even if the brand names remain state-owned - would be an effective means of steering reluctant state bodies down the private-equity route.

    "It's possible," one state chairman admitted when that scenario was put to him yesterday. "It's very possible."

    The premature revelation of the Victory bid is certain to dramatically raise the stakes at Tuesday's meeting of state chairmen with the ARU.

    "There is nothing that is off the table," said ARU chairman Peter McGrath, referring to the meeting. "Private equity will definitely be discussed. We want to introduce additional capital. It works in the UK and France, but no one size fits all and we don't want to make the same mistakes made in those countries."

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...015656,00.html

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,828
    vCash
    5564000
    It works in the UK and France - Peter McGrath
    But does it work to the detriment of SH internationals, Pacific Islands and Argentina?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  3. #3
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    22,945
    vCash
    428000
    In terms of sustainability, it is only sustainable in the NH as they have a pool of SH nations to draw off. If they had only the NH there would be three less teams in the English PL for starters.
    I'm all for increased investment and sponsorship but am very nervous if they are talking private ownership.
    Goodbye Tests by 2020 if that is the case, would be in name only with all the best players privately contracted and unavailable.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

Similar Threads

  1. Melbourne makes Super 15 sense
    By travelling_gerry in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-06-09, 19:48
  2. And the winner should be … Melbourne
    By travelling_gerry in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 22-03-09, 11:09
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-03-09, 12:39
  4. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 21-07-08, 14:10
  5. Melbourne Super 14 key to luring Pumas
    By AndyS in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-12-07, 08:27

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •