Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Force cut their losses and take Firepower failure on the chin

  1. #1
    Legend Contributor Thequeerone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wanneroo
    Posts
    5,348
    vCash
    5000000

    Force cut their losses and take Firepower failure on the chin

    The Western Force Super 14 franchise are reluctant to pursue controversial sponsor Firepower through the courts to recover hundreds of thousands of dollars owed them.

    Force chairman Geoff Stooke said yesterday that he believed "there would be no money to recover money from".

    Force cut their losses and take Firepower failure on the chin

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    61 years between Grand Slams Was the wait worth it - Ya betta baby

  2. #2
    Veteran BLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,759
    vCash
    5004000
    You've got to wonder whether any of the Force administrators will be held accountable, did they even have a look at Firepowers cash flow at the time?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #3
    Champion Tazzmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,083
    vCash
    5430000
    Did CEO (P.O.M) not quit round about the time FirePower stopped paying players Dec Jan, has the fall already been taken?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    (formerly known as Coach) Your Humble Servant Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    14,228
    vCash
    266778
    For a Jacquelin Magnay article, that read surprisingly like an unbiased reporting of the facts ...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Champion
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    girrawheen
    Posts
    1,299
    vCash
    5000000
    Yes, That's what I thought as well. Perhaps they are worried about threat of legal action

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    22,725
    vCash
    368000
    Re accountability, genuine question, is it up to the Force to do due diligence on a potential sponsor if they are offering?
    Would they even have a right to do so?
    Assumption is often the mother of all f*ckups but if someone is offering sponsorship I would think the norm would be to assume that they have run the figures and have the funds available.
    I doubt they checked Emirates cash flow before taking them on and the same protocols would be in place for all sponsors I would think?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

  7. #7
    Veteran TOCC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    3,597
    vCash
    5000000
    I thought since it was a third party agreement that the Force werent responsible for the payments to the players.

    The money owing to the club on the other hand is a problem.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Veteran BLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,759
    vCash
    5004000
    Quote Originally Posted by Burgs View Post
    I doubt they checked Emirates cash flow before taking them on and the same protocols would be in place for all sponsors I would think?
    Assumptions only work if there is logic to it, Emirates is a well established large company with no end in sight. Firepower are still an unknown quantity and before such large amounts were offers as sponsorship due diligence surely would have been needed. It's all well and good wanting sponsorship dollars but if you are getting half a million dollars you need to check the companies assets, cash flows and/or any guarantees they have on the money. It seems all the Force got were the intangible promise Firepower will be rich as kings. They should have secured the sponsorship dollars through a contract secured by Firepowers real assets, we could be winding up Firepower right about now and getting our money instead of waiting for the court system to bleed them dry.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #9
    Champion KenyaQuin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,264
    vCash
    5000000
    To be fair, how much information required will be freely released by a company? What would the expectation have been had the sponsor been Ansett or One.Tel or Bridgecorp, for example? I'm not privy to the dealings between sponsor and sponsored but I would think that unless you're into corporate forensics, somethings just can't be avoided.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #10
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    travelling_gerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    18,483
    vCash
    5080000
    Quote Originally Posted by BLR View Post
    Assumptions only work if there is logic to it, Emirates is a well established large company with no end in sight. Firepower are still an unknown quantity and before such large amounts were offers as sponsorship due diligence surely would have been needed. It's all well and good wanting sponsorship dollars but if you are getting half a million dollars you need to check the companies assets, cash flows and/or any guarantees they have on the money. It seems all the Force got were the intangible promise Firepower will be rich as kings. They should have secured the sponsorship dollars through a contract secured by Firepowers real assets, we could be winding up Firepower right about now and getting our money instead of waiting for the court system to bleed them dry.
    Corporate failures are a fact of business.

    But as a former Rugby Club secretary I would imagine the answer from a potential sponsorship offer from "Bill the local electrician" to his rugby club and then being asked to lay open his books would be........

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  11. #11
    Rookie Jasper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Kensington
    Posts
    63
    vCash
    5000000
    Should also be noted that Firepower did meet all its commitments for the last 2.5 - to 3 years up until December 07 - so wasn't as if they made a commitment and then did not deliver anything

    - having said that - Mr Johnston did go extremely overboard with all the sponsorships.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Jasper

  12. #12
    Veteran BLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,759
    vCash
    5004000
    Quote Originally Posted by KenyaQuin View Post
    To be fair, how much information required will be freely released by a company? What would the expectation have been had the sponsor been Ansett or One.Tel or Bridgecorp, for example? I'm not privy to the dealings between sponsor and sponsored but I would think that unless you're into corporate forensics, somethings just can't be avoided.
    Well RugbyWA could have surely asked for a statement of Firepowers assets and projected earnings over the contract period, they could even go as far as to ask for an individual accountant to have a look at it. It's not neccesary by law but is a step that could have realistically been taken, hell, when you sell a second hand car the buyer can ask it to get certified by RAC, dealing with such amounts of money surely some steps would have needed to be taken.

    If RugbyWA had asked for reports Income, Balance, and Cash flow Statements they could have been refused but if so they would have known Firepower wasn' above board and we wouldn't be in this mess.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #13
    Legend Contributor Thequeerone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wanneroo
    Posts
    5,348
    vCash
    5000000
    how often would you refuse someone who offered you sponsorship - perhaps asking for so much up front before announcing it or putting it on shirts .. but even so not many companies want to be in firepowers position were they are seen to let down people's favourite sporting club to the tune of a couple of mill - for rugbywa bad for basketball devastating

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    61 years between Grand Slams Was the wait worth it - Ya betta baby

  14. #14
    Legend Contributor brokendown gunfighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    wembley
    Posts
    8,046
    vCash
    5390000
    asking for that information might have upset the Russian mafia BLR

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #15
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    22,725
    vCash
    368000
    So a couple of (I'm guessing) layman's views on what "should" have happened, and we have established that you don't need to ask Emirates or Bill the sparky.
    I think the reality is probably close to what KQ is saying, it's all well and good with old 20-20 hindsight but as Jasper say's, they were meeting their commitments.
    I admit to guessing this, but I would think it would be highly irregular for an orginisation to checking up on a potential sponsor.
    It was certainly an unusual sponsor when announced but hey, so is ET Mining, perhaps they are dodgy too.
    There's only a few that put any faith in FMG too...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •