1
Nope, the article dated 26th August is during/after the signing. The article is describing the board meeting as being last week, which Smith labels as eight days before the signing.
another Patsy obfuscation and deflection exposed
He whined Several times it was deemed a lawful action to cut the Force. Only the single clause giving them the ability to cut the Force was investigated, nothing to do with was the contract itself being lawful. These revelations make It is increasingly clear the contract itself is flawed.
Further, I wonder who at ARU put in the infamous clause:
ARU CEO Bill Pulver said everything was open for discussion, but it was unlikely changes would be made until the end of the 2020 television broadcast deal.