0
We (Referees) also review all our game videos midweek, if it's as bad as you say I am sure the ref will be disappointed that they didn't pick it up in the game and award the proper sanction. Obviously I make the assumption that your description is correct, as I only have your side to look at.
If you are offside and advance to prevent a QT you may be penalised (depending on if you successful affect the play), once the QT is no longer available, offsides are finished.
It was clear there were the white touch lines and the blue rugby lines, but to me it was very easy to tell the difference and I had no problems. The white touch lines were faded and not very thick, where the rugby lines were clear and proper thickness. I didn't referee at Rosalie so can't comments on if it's an improvement or not.
Apparently there was an act of thuggery by a cott player on Saturday that is going to be cited? Heard there's footage in Facebook from a spectators camera that is full of incriminating evidence
Posted via Mobile Device
Cott and thuggery go together.
Sanctioned by rugby wa usually. Cott are the protected ones.
Rumour has it that the Cott guy who king hit an unconscious player in the Margaret River sevens only got 5 weeks!
Absolutely pathetic.
Don't get your hopes up Goony; judiciary will probably let him off and blame the Baysie player for getting his head in the way of the Cott players fist.
Lost all confidence in the judiciary process.
Wests Scarborough 1st Grade juggernaut has played finals rugby each and every year since its inception and continues this remarkable feat yet again this season and unbelievably it's still rolling on and as an added little circle jerk for the masses Wests actually hold the record for the current longest unbroken finals record.
I thought he was banned for the pre season (3 or 4 games) and 5 more after that once the season started. 8-9 weeks. The Judiciary has to comply with IRB sentencing guidelines, I assumed they did that. Its called the Crimes Act and sets penalties for various offences. Any sentence they give has to fit the Crimes Act. Sentences are usually in a range eg 4 - 8 weeks and they have some discretion to take into account things like previous good behaviour etc...
Which begs the question, what bunch of compromised incompetents do we have sitting on the judiciary?
One of the touch judges present at the incident described it to me and was absolutely gob smacked when they found out the leniency of the sentence. Said it was the most viscious assault they had witnessed on or off the rugby pitch.
An absolute farce.
If you murdered or permanently maimed someone in a rugby game I'm sure there's a little rule book that the rugby wa judiciary uses that says the player should get 5-6 weeks. And if a Cott player, 3 weeks!