Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Possible Bipartisan Province for S15 Melbourne

  1. #16
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    now your talking jargs and it goes ahead... you will get to see more Force games each year... a win win I would say... the Talent is out there go get them...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #17
    (formerly known as Coach) Your Humble Servant Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    14,233
    vCash
    274778
    If South Africa pull out - why not throw it wide open and have 2 extra teams Australia and 3 in New Zealand. The talent pool would get very diluted, but all teams in both countries would be in the same boat. The overall team standard may drop for a while - but when it starts to pick up again.....

    We'd still have 14 teams - no need for new logos/stationary etc. Give a team to the vics and Sth Australia and all but tassie (maybe a south island NZ team can relocate there?) and NT (with an average alcohol consuumption of 47 beers a night for every man, woman and child, I don;t think they'd care anyway) are represented ....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #18
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Well that might be a bit OTT... sensible growth might be more prudent...

    South Africa won’t be pulling out, the ARU and NZRU will be dissolving the SANZAR super rugby agreement and creating a new tournament…

    South Africa will have to find their own way home…

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #19
    Veteran laura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Sticks
    Posts
    4,139
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskippr
    South Africa will have to find their own way home…
    Or they'll just move to Australia or New Zealand and try and become included in our teams during the Super 14 season then bugger off back to SA for Springboks.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #20
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by laura View Post
    Or they'll just move to Australia or New Zealand and try and become included in our teams during the Super 14 season then bugger off back to SA for Springboks.
    Possibly, if it allowed by the ARU NZRU or the new NZAR previously know as SANZAR I'm fine with that, our grounds, our rules, our refs...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #21
    (formerly known as Coach) Your Humble Servant Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    14,233
    vCash
    274778
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    Well that might be a bit OTT
    aww... I dunno - I reckon it'd be a goer....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #22
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    aww... I dunno - I reckon it'd be a goer....
    reads like... cynicism... from unfulfilled expectations...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #23
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,266
    vCash
    5116000
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    If South Africa pull out - why not throw it wide open and have 2 extra teams Australia and 3 in New Zealand. The talent pool would get very diluted, but all teams in both countries would be in the same boat. The overall team standard may drop for a while - but when it starts to pick up again.....

    We'd still have 14 teams - no need for new logos/stationary etc. Give a team to the vics and Sth Australia and all but tassie (maybe a south island NZ team can relocate there?) and NT (with an average alcohol consuumption of 47 beers a night for every man, woman and child, I don;t think they'd care anyway) are represented ....
    But then that might as well be the ANZ cup. Not a bad idea, but I would have said the proposed Trans-tasman Super comp for News first, then an Australian/NZ provincial comp. It would get us our ARC replacement, and it would get the Kiwi's the revenue they need to prop up their provinces. It would definitely generate television interest too, and being a separate comp from the TT it could be aimed at FTA (subject to strict restrictions on the number and timing of ads!).

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. And the winner should be … Melbourne
    By travelling_gerry in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 22-03-09, 11:09
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-03-09, 12:39
  3. Melbourne on chopping block
    By Burgs in forum National Rugby Championship (NRC)
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 28-11-07, 17:17
  4. Call to move Brumbies to Melbourne
    By Burgs in forum ACT Brumbies
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-04-07, 10:56
  5. Crusaders announce Melbourne base
    By Burgs in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-04-06, 06:51

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •