0
I think there's both good and bad in that article.jones made some good points in his rants and those were what I agreed with.
You could argue that most of the repair in the relationship is as a result of the removal of Clunes cabal of fuckwits, the main point of Jones ire, so a differently focussed article could paint a very different picture.
I'm cautiously optimistic, simply because all the good has come at the hands of a chairman who has exactly the same power and control as Clyne but happens not to be an egomanaical psychopath.
Just because the king of the swamp is a nice guy doesn't mean the swamp shouldn't be changed