0
Personally I don't think Gits should be a first choice #13 as he doesn't have the body to take the extra tackle load, I believe it would end his career prematurely.
While you are correct to an extent Sage with $$$'s = "do as he's told" he wouldn't have signed to come West without some assurances that he will play in his (publicly declared) favoured position. That said I'm sure he will play some of '07 at five eight however I doubt he will be wearing a #10 when he does.
Re Diggers at #13, I think he is a way off from having the required ball skills to hold down this critical position. This will develope with time as you say Andy but in the short term I am pretty sure he will remain on the Wing. As you alluded to, I think there are still two players to leave the list from '06 to make it all balance out?
I don't recall now how that worked, if all S14 squads are standardised at 33 and the Force had a one year exemption or what?
I would think that it would be better for WA and Aus Rugby if we maintained the forty man squads though.