0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
How can you be certain it was 30 players, so far Matt Giteau, Drew Mitchell, Nathan Sharpe and Richard Brown have all denied having any involvement. I'm quite certain that out of a squad of 32 last year that means only 28 could have signed the vote...unless they're all lying and were tortured into saying it
How on Earth is a newspaper in Sydney more reliable than the word of a player...or 4?Originally Posted by joondalup_dave
If he is saying things then he should be old enough to deal with that. Like you keep saying they are told to keep with their code of silence, but if there really was one then surely he would have had his butt hauled over the coals by now. Obviously players can say whatever they like and then they have to deal with the consequences. As much as it pains me to rehash the quokka thing. The boys did the crime and were dealt with, you stuff up you cop it. Simple as that. If Haig gets in trouble thats his own problem, no one forced him to say anything and no one else should be held accountable. Same goes for any other player.Originally Posted by joondalup_dave
Besides why should Haig Sare get in trouble for voicing his opinion?
Last edited by laura; 29-01-09 at 17:14.
true lanca you have me on that. i have no idea what a troll is but i am sure it is true
But it is okay to tell the world that, regardless of anything said or done in the future, the players all hate Mitchell...
You might want to check with your mate in Sydney though - I am pretty sure RUPA has not been involved in any way with the issue. Is he a journalist?
80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?
Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!
Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!
I shal provide you of a lesson for the price of free.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(internet)
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]