Love Submission 15.
Love Submission 15.
Submission 15 is absolute GOLD.... Its just the vibe of it
OK.
But everybody that posts on Roar, GAGR, rugby.com.au ,the Australian, Planetrugby, facebook etc, should post the instructions on where to find the complete report. As ARU tactics are and will be to cherry pick a bit that they want to refute and ignore the rest. We want as many rugby people as possible to read the whole thing
Submission 15 is a beauty. 16 asks some pertinent questions around constitutionality. NSWRUs submission sucks a lollypop.
Hopefully Linda can decipher the cheese from the chalk and we see some action. Go Linda Go!
Look at poor Linda, you would have thought she'd had enough of slimy little reptiles at the Senate Enquiry :sarcastic:
https://twitter.com/Science_Academy/...59410720247808
Rob Clarke and the VRU's answers to their questions on notice are up as well
I submitted an article to The Roar yesterday out of frustration of the media sanitation of the hearing. None of their in-house writers have gone near it.
Not my finest work, but I am hoping it will at least spark some conversation and visibility when (if) it gets published.
I have just read Clarke and North's answers to the questions on notice. North is trying to play dumb in not knowing what the question, be pompous and not who they met. It was pretty badly written for a QC.
Clarke said he was at the Weary Dunlop Club lunch on at 6th February 2015 but can't recall who he met and who was in attendance.
Not worth a look really. The only questions they "answered" were about the initial meeting / introduction to Andrew Cox.
It seems that may have perhaps been the only question on notice for Tim North and Rob Clarke, which would be very disappointing. Surely there are a lot of further questions that need to be answered by the VRU and Rob Clarke after they fronted the enquiry?!