I think both legal teams have had enough time to get their arguments prepared so it makes sense to go straight into the appeal hearing. No point dragging it out for another 2 weeks.
Printable View
I think both legal teams have had enough time to get their arguments prepared so it makes sense to go straight into the appeal hearing. No point dragging it out for another 2 weeks.
I've been told by a Sydney legal that Justice Hammerschlag is "smart as a whip. Very fair". Liking him so far.
ARU now defining their own terms & the alliance agreement & clauses.
Justice Hammerschlag - Did anyone argue this as invalid due to vagueness? Re: the alliance agreement clause 2 and its extras.
(From the 1st bit)
ARU tying to define the "negotiation" and "termination" meanings of the alliance agreement.
That doesn't sound good, it sounds like hes saying the entire clause is invalid since it doesn't include a date, would that be correct?
The Judge is discussing the terms terminated & its finality & negotiated & the clause it's in the alliance agreement.