Originally Posted by
SteveWA
Not over yet, and now the real fun begins. All the judgement means is that the Alliance agreement legally entitled the ARU to terminate the Force. The broader question of whether they were morally or ethically right in doing so is another issue.
Questions need to be asked, like what changes did the ARU request to the Alliance agreement that put them in a position to use it to remove the force? Questions about deceptive and unconscionable conduct by directors towards a shareholder, and fraudulent misrepresentation by directors.