Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Melbourne Rebels sale opens door to cut club, says former Wallaby John Welborn

  1. #1
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    home
    Posts
    2,066
    vCash
    5106000

    Melbourne Rebels sale opens door to cut club, says former Wallaby John Welborn

    Saw this in the Sunday Times now online at The West

    Nick Taylor
    Sunday, 6 August 2017 11:45AM

    The controversial sale of Melbourne Rebels to the Victorian Rugby Union is the springboard for the Australian Rugby Union to jettison the Super Rugby club, says former Wallabies and Force forward John Welborn.
    The ARU was blindsided by Friday's move that saw Rebels owner Andrew Cox's Imperium Sports Group quietly sell 11,625,000 shares to the VRU for just $1, throwing the future of Super Rugby into further chaos.
    ARU chairman Cameron Clyne, chief executive Bill Pulver and board members only discovered the move when it surfaced in the media.
    The Rebels and Western Force are under threat of the ARU axe from Super Rugby next season and yesterday Force billionaire backer Andrew Forrest spoke to Clyne asking for clarification of the situation.

    More here

    https://thewest.com.au/sport/rugby-u...-ng-b88559512z

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by wholetruth; 06-08-17 at 12:25.

  2. #2
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,508
    vCash
    1296000
    You know what? I was just thinking,

    The VRU have no assets or cash reserves to support the Rebels, RugbyWA are in the same boat re the Force. the private ownership model is now dead and all team administration is now (albeit with some variations re the Force and the Tahs) in the hands of state unions and the ARU continue to bleat about the unbudgeted funds being used to prop up Super rugby.

    PErfect solution, go to SANZAaR and tell them we won't be able to "cut" or "chop" a team immediately, but we do have a plan to ensure that Australia will field an appropriate number of competitive and financially stable teams. Announce to each team the budgeted spend on Super rugby grants, divide that number by 5 and steadfastly refuse to give a single cent to anybody. If the "Heartland states" deserve to be protected in the way they are, they will be able to sustain themselves fiscally. If the teams who are under threat of extinction are there as a result of an informed and dispassionate assessment they will fall. Let the free market decide who goes and who stays, what are you scared of money-pit NSWRU?

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  3. #3
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,508
    vCash
    1296000
    This issue is not about not knowing how to save Aussie rugby, it's about not having the huevos to actually do it!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  4. #4
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    155
    vCash
    5000000
    Really interesting point which John Welborn makes, the Rebels do appear to have just given the ARU a reason to get rid of them. I remember when the news about the sale of the Rebels first came out I wondered whether it was an ARU beat up (oh no, we can't remove the Rebels now, since they're owned by VRU). I'm still not sure whether this whole thing is actually an ARU beat up. It'll be interesting to see how the ARU play this one.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by chrisk; 06-08-17 at 21:02.

  5. #5
    Senior Player Contributor DarthMoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    The Bup
    Posts
    658
    vCash
    21266000
    Rebels Facebook media team seems pretty happy, even if they couldn't field enough players to fill all their jerseys for the photo:https://www.facebook.com/melbournere...69867719720445

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    travelling_gerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    18,483
    vCash
    5062000
    The Australian12:00AM August 7, 2017


    WAYNE SMITH
    Senior sport writerBrisbane
    @WayneKeithSmith

    It’s not yet all over for the Australian Rugby Union. However, the moment has arrived for it to consider not just that it may not be able to cull one of its five Super Rugby teams, but also all of the ramifications that will flow from that.

    The ARU reacted with outrage at news the Melbourne Rebels — who, with the Western Force, are one of the two teams it had marked for possible extermination — had changed owners late on Friday.

    It insisted that, “despite recent attempts to confirm their position”, the Rebels had left the ARU in the dark about plans to switch from owner Andrew Cox and his Imperium Group to the Victorian Rugby Union, in contravention of their Participation Deed.

    This was erroneous on two counts, according to the statement released yesterday by the VRU. First, the VRU had kept the ARU board and management informed of the progress of the sale every step of the way, as one would expect from an organisation chaired by Tim North QC.

    Second, as The Weekend Australian explained, the sale may not have been the ARU’s to approve. The 2015 sales contract with Cox included a put option that allowed him to return the Rebels debt-free to the VRU for what he paid for them, $1. By signing off on the deal, the ARU effectively was giving pre-approval for the transfer back to the VRU. So the national body hardly needed to approve a sale it had already condoned.

    Yet again, the ARU looks to have been outmanoeuvred, which has happened time and again throughout this whole “five into four” process. While the put option had never been revealed to the public, the ARU cannot have been unaware of it nor, indeed, been ignorant of its potential to derail the ARU’s plans to buy back the Rebels’ licence and close them down.

    So now, the ARU must decide if it will test in court whether the Participation Deed does in fact trump the put option. Otherwise, Australian rugby has come full circle, right back to the starting point where the ARU originally promised SANZAAR it would cut one of its teams, knowing full well it would be the Force, which it owns.

    If the arbitration process held with the Force last week goes the ARU’s way, it will attempt to close down the franchise almost immediately, although the Perth club has already signalled its intention to appeal to the Supreme Court.Even if fast-tracked, this process could take four to six weeks, time SANZAAR doesn’t have if it is to do all the logistical planning needed to get the 2018 season organised.

    If the Force prevail, the ARU must decide whether to continue to pursue the costly legal process through the courts, or admit defeat and go back to SANZAAR and admit it had promised what it couldn’t deliver. Increasingly, this is looking like the probable outcome — which means the time has come to start analysing how the ARU placed itself in this humiliating mess.

    Right from the outset, those at the ARU’s St Leonards base in Sydney made no attempt to consult with anyone who did not agree with their world view that (a) they needed to support grassroots rugby, however poorly defined that might be; that (b) running five professional Super Rugby teams was unsustainable and (c) that five teams was uncompetitive, despite Queensland and NSW both winning Super Rugby titles when there were five Australian franchises.

    Even the one ARU board member who disputed this world view was shunned and ostracised. Sources have told The Australian that Geoff Stooke, the only member of the nine-strong board who back in April voted against cutting one of the teams, was asked to recuse himself from ARU boardroom discussions on this issue, primarily because of a perceived conflict of interest and specifically that he had purchased 10 shares in the Own the Force campaign.

    Goodness gracious, who would have suspected Stooke would support a Perth team, just because he lives there and was the original Western Force chairman?

    He has played, astonishingly, somewhere in the vicinity of 900 games of club rugby union — which is more than fellow directors John Eales, Paul McLean and Brett Robinson, Wallabies all, could collectively muster — so when the talk turns to grassroots rugby, he is right in his element. By all means, factor in his WA bias, but in a boardroom of corporate high-flyers, surely Stooke’s was the common man’s voice that should have been listened to?

    Yet there is evidence a number of directors are becoming increasingly concerned by the massive reputational damage that is being inflicted on rugby through and because of this issue. Whatever crises other sports are going through lately, they at least can console themselves that they are not going as badly nor perceived as poorly as rugby union. And no doubt directors also are concerned about how their individual reputations are holding up.

    All the good work CEO Bill Pulver initially achieved in terms of improving the ARU’s relationships with its constituent bodies and its finances has been undone over the past year. Certainly it has no credibility left with the Victorian and West Australian governments, nor with the Victorian and WA state bodies. The ARU might give lip service to the idea of everyone working together, but by that it means everyone doing precisely what head office dictates. As for the state of the ARU’s finances, it’s a disaster on every level, though money can always be found for expensive legal battles.

    Through all of this, many of the constituent bodies have done little to bring credit on themselves.

    The day is coming, and soon, when difficult issues such as a workable salary cap, Wallaby top-ups, a draft of some description and compensation for producing players will have to be discussed, at least if there is to be some semblance of fairness among Australia’s Super Rugby teams. That’s when those states who have kept their heads down while the Force and the Rebels were in such peril, hoping to benefit from the dispersion of players, from whichever side went under,will need to sit down with the Perth and Melbourne franchises and work out how an equitable system can be built from the ground up.

    Something good has to come out of all of this, something must. As they say often in rugby, never waste a good crisis.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spor...dd07b664cc5311

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #7
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Bullcreek
    Posts
    1,265
    vCash
    5524000
    Wow good news they are starting to get concerned about the damage to their reputations!!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Champion Contributor sandgroperrugby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wattle Grove
    Posts
    2,083
    vCash
    5308000
    Sounds like bully boy board room tactics to try and get rid of or discredit a long standing servant of the game. Shame on you ARU.

    So none of the other people on the board want to support rugby by purchasing shares in the own the Force campaign. Well that's telling isn't it. What a disgrace they are.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Generally speaking you aren’t learning much if your lips are moving!!!

  9. #9
    Legend Contributor blueandblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    6,087
    vCash
    8894664
    "While the put option had never been revealed to the public, the ARU cannot have been unaware of it "

    Why not? They didn't realise or remember they'd signed an agreement with us ensuring our survival for this broadcast agreement.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "12 Years a Supporter" starring the #SeaOfBlue

  10. #10
    Veteran sittingbison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    North Freo
    Posts
    2,800
    vCash
    5000000
    ...Yet there is evidence a number of directors are becoming increasingly concerned by the massive reputational damage that is being inflicted on rugby through and because of this issue...And no doubt directors also are concerned about how their individual reputations are holding up...
    Good to see they have their fingers on the pulse of public opinion....not!

    FFS are they blind at the wheel? Every single day for 110 days they have been lambasted and denigrated. Even Reds and Tahrds supporters are fed up with this fiasco. And worst, the fifth column oops I mean fourth estate have turned on them. Wallabies played like turkeys in June, the Tahrds and Reds were complete shite all season, Rebels clueless. Perth won the NRC and equal with Brumbies, half the team in the W squad, sorted it's financials before the Day of Infamy. Yup let's "exterminate" them

    Oh, and let's send Stooke to Coventry while we're at it.

    It's now time to call for that vote of no confidence and dump the entire board. Come on you gutless wonder stakeholders, just do it

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    The long sobs of autumn's violins wound my heart with a monotonous languor

  11. #11
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,726
    vCash
    5470000
    I said in another thread that if the price that has to be paid to achieve the things Wayne talked about at the end of the article is that the current ARU had to crash and burn then so be it. The damage, incompetence and deceit have that happening before our eyes right now. I just want this to be over. Buy our shares, secure the Force and see some honest people pick up the pieces and make those changes.

    Maybe the other franchises should come up with similar community based part ownership schemes.

    4 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  12. #12
    Immortal Contributor jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    10,554
    vCash
    5000000
    I went as far as to look for a book this farce just then. Sportsbet are missing a golden opportunity

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #13
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,508
    vCash
    1296000
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-0...to-vic/8779434

    It appears as though the Rebels' lawyers feel they can build a case that the ARU had already approved the transfer of ownership when they signed off on the Imperium deal. It looks more and more that the executive staff of the ARU have spent their very expensive hours in office playing soggy Sao whilst the rest of the world writes contracts that secure what they need.

    This mob need to go as soon as possible, every dollar they receive appears to cost the ARU about 10.

    the inability to organise a pissup in a brewery line is too generous for them, they would struggle to organise breathing in .......air or something like that!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  14. #14
    Senior Player Herbasimplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Valley Forge
    Posts
    529
    vCash
    5000000
    meh this has the potential to go on forever but I have no sympathy for the rebels or their 13 supporters now because of the way they constantly portray themselves (and us) in social media.

    1. We given given assurances that we will stay (force will go) haha.
    2. We in line for the chop now - what? How could that be us and not the force. Well doesn't matter our white knight cox will never sell the licence back to the ARU we're safe. But the force don't own their licence so they're done. Supporters actually backing their team with money to own the licence is silly.
    3 Hmm arbitration...well we agree with the ARU on that one. We don't need to worry about the assurances until 2020 because the SANZAAR knight of the long knives which boned 3 teams has changed the agreement now. So walk on Force.
    4. oh cox did cut and run..no matter the VRU own us so we are in an even stronger position.
    5. look at the market. Melbourne will soon be the largest city in australia, doesn't matter about our juniors or bums on seats or how the team is performing.

    Illogical claptrap delivered with a level of smugness reserved for east coast rugby.

    Think it was said before during the 48-72 hour period where time has stood still that no matter what happens now the rebels are a dead team walking. The ARU have shoved rivers of gold at a private ownership model and now that particular river has run dry and all the indicia such as membership, sponsorship, crowds and results have gone south in a big way, the first thing the private owner does is drop the dead donkey rather than put his hand in his own pocket.

    Given the enormous (and exponentially growing) pile of shite the ARU is creating right now I would be surprised if they could stave of bankruptcy let alone give an organisation which has very little assets ,the VRU, money above and beyond whatever deals they do with the reds, tahs and brumbies.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Non sunt multiplicanda entia sine necessitate

  15. #15
    Player LMSC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    202
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by GIGS20 View Post
    You know what? I was just thinking,

    The VRU have no assets or cash reserves to support the Rebels, RugbyWA are in the same boat re the Force. the private ownership model is now dead and all team administration is now (albeit with some variations re the Force and the Tahs) in the hands of state unions and the ARU continue to bleat about the unbudgeted funds being used to prop up Super rugby.

    PErfect solution, go to SANZAaR and tell them we won't be able to "cut" or "chop" a team immediately, but we do have a plan to ensure that Australia will field an appropriate number of competitive and financially stable teams. Announce to each team the budgeted spend on Super rugby grants, divide that number by 5 and steadfastly refuse to give a single cent to anybody. If the "Heartland states" deserve to be protected in the way they are, they will be able to sustain themselves fiscally. If the teams who are under threat of extinction are there as a result of an informed and dispassionate assessment they will fall. Let the free market decide who goes and who stays, what are you scared of money-pit NSWRU?
    The Force may actually be cash flow positive this year, off the back of the biggest front of shirt sponsor in the competition. The irony being, if they turn a profit, the $ will go to the ARU (thanks to all the hard work the RWA crew, not ARU, did), with the ARU citing poor finances as the reason for cutting a super side.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. World Cup door opens for Cummins
    By wholetruth in forum Western Force
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-10-14, 09:44
  2. Beale is shown the door at the Melbourne Rebels
    By The Man in forum Melbourne Rebels
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13-07-13, 10:45
  3. Door opens for Bartholomeusz
    By travelling_gerry in forum Mark Bartholomeusz
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 17-12-10, 09:32
  4. New door opens for Nemani Nadolo
    By Burgs in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-06-10, 00:45
  5. Force toll opens door for rookie
    By laura in forum Western Force
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-05-08, 23:05

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •