Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: ARU needs to be overhauled

  1. #1
    Legend Contributor Alison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,308
    vCash
    5000000

    ARU needs to be overhauled

    This article from Wayne Smith in today's Australian is 100% on point, in my opinion. Well said that man.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spor...0b73b9554c8959


    WAYNE SMITH
    ARU needs to be overhauled after this Super Rugby fiasco

    It was my long-time former editor-in-chief Chris Mitchell who told me once that my greatest asset as a journalist was that I saw both sides of every argument; and my greatest weakness as a journalist was that I saw both sides of every argument.

    Fair call. We each go with what we’ve got. So it may take me some time to arrive at conclusions that other people reached almost instantaneously.

    Certainly in the case of the Australian Rugby Union’s handling of the process to dump one of its five teams from Super Rugby, I tried not to be critical. It was a hellishly difficult decision, one that called for strong, decisive leadership.

    But it has been mishandled right from the start, at virtually every level, and now the ARU is utterly lost — hemmed in by *potential or actual lawsuits at every turn.

    Even the men most likely to be hurt by its decision, Western Force coach Dave Wessels and Melbourne Rebels coach Tony McGahan, are appealing for an end to the agony of uncertainty. The ARU must find answers, and quickly.

    How this all ends, I haven’t a clue, not now, not after everything rugby has been put through. But one thing now is inescapably clear — the ARU needs to be overhauled from top to bottom.

    It starts with management. If chief executive Bill Pulver and deputy chairman Brett Robinson went to the London meeting of SANZAAR with the decision already made to drop the Force, then at least it was a defensible decision, even if not one that I or a host of people would agree with. Seemingly they told SANZAAR that the Force were now owned by the ARU and could be wrapped up with a minimum of fuss.

    But details are now starting to emerge that they neglected to tell their joint-venture partners that in purchasing the licence from the Force last August, they signed an agreement that guaranteed the West Australians there would be a Super Rugby presence in Perth through to the end of 2020. It may be that the ARU didn’t think that clause would be a problem. By reducing the competition from 18 teams to 15, it may have thought that this voided the agreement, but that’s one hell of an assumption to make. And it’s also one hell of an oversight not to at least alert SANZAAR of the potential problem.

    Now, the caveat here is that pretty much everything that has been done has been done in secret, so this information is sketchy and might be entirely off the mark. What information there is has come forth only in whispers and has had to be pieced together. It may be that there was a perfectly rational explanation for every action the Australian delegates took, but who would know?

    What can be said with certainty is that SANZAAR sources have told The Australian they were shocked to find that there was an agreement in place between the ARU and the Force that pretty much made the club *unsackable.

    What’s more, the ARU board only became aware of this same clause some time later. So presumably it was making decisions while it was not in possession of the full facts. More on this later.

    Then there was the process of evaluating which club would be culled.

    Initially, there was no process. It has decided on the Force and all the energy of the ARU was directed towards finding a justification that supported that conclusion. It was only when the ARU began to realise that it was about to encounter considerable opposition along the way that the search was widened to include the Melbourne Rebels and the Brumbies.

    Even this was wrong. NSW and Queensland should have been thrown into the mix as well. And while they are the two heartland states and pretty much indispensable to Australian rugby, they should have been required to justify their existence.

    That case might have been more awkward than it seems. The Reds could have been wound up as insolvent as recently as November; the Waratahs, meanwhile, are battling to pull a crowd in Australia’s largest city.

    Nor should ARU chief operating officer Rob Clarke have been part of the process of selecting which team was culled. He is a former chief executive of both the Brumbies and the Rebels, as intimately involved with both clubs as it is possible to be, and it is understandable that Force fans feel dismayed by his involvement.

    Clarke may well have felt that having Force boss Mark Sinderberry reporting directly to him also gave him a strong attachment to the Perth club but that’s not how it has been perceived. And as Clarke himself has often said, perception is reality.

    And, although he hasn’t been directly involved in this process, any review of the ARU needs to take in the performance of Ben Whitaker in the high performance manager’s role. In some circles, he is widely praised, in others, not so much. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating and over the four years Whitaker has been in that role the skill levels of Australian players have fallen significantly compared to New Zealand players, while the under-20 program has descended into obscurity for a nation that prides itself on ranking in the top three globally.

    As for Pulver himself, he has said that he would resign tomorrow if it would serve the good of the game. There is no doubting he had the good of rugby at heart but how will it be possible for him to lead the game after this?

    It is one thing for the ARU directors to feel let down by the performance of management but if they really understood rugby, how would it have been possible for them to be misled?

    It is said that virtually every ARU board meeting is consumed by finances, or rather the lack thereof.

    When the game is in trouble, there is no doubt that finances are critical. But there is more to rugby than dollars and cents and somehow this has been lost at the upper levels of the game.

    A lot of lip service has been paid to doing more for grassroots and there is no doubt the arguments of Brett Papworth and the Shute Shield clubs would have received a timely boost from Rebels coach McGahan’s comment overnight — that there were six forwards in his match-day squad of 23 who were not even on Super Rugby contracts. They were ring-ins from clubland — yet still they managed a draw with the Sharks.

    So clubland is relevant today and can return to those bygone days when it was more relevant still.

    But the game needs more than that. It needs a renaissance of its morale and spirit and vigour.

    How many of the nine ARU directors are equipped to provide that?

    3 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Proudly Western Australian; Proudly supporting Western Australian rugby

  2. #2
    Player Invictus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Banksia Grove
    Posts
    381
    vCash
    5000000
    My grandmother could run the joint better than the ARU, and she has been dead for 28 years!

    Time for a revolution!!!

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #3
    Champion MI5_Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    1,728
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
    My grandmother could run the joint better than the ARU, and she has been dead for 28 years!

    Time for a revolution!!!
    spinning in her grave?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Senior Player Contributor WF2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Gwelup
    Posts
    906
    vCash
    5002000
    Quote Originally Posted by Alison View Post

    How many of the nine ARU directors are equipped to provide that?
    At least One! Go Geoff.

    maybe Eales.....................?

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Veteran SNOB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Carramar WA (gods country)!
    Posts
    4,061
    vCash
    3481639
    ARU and plan is the same as America and intelligence!

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    May the FORCE be with you!

  6. #6
    Senior Player Herbasimplex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Valley Forge
    Posts
    529
    vCash
    5000000
    see also soccer journo Cockerill's article. Written from that slant but basically says Rugby's position is irretrievable now. He may be right.

    http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/f...15-gvlogn.html

    Football Federation Australia can thrive where the Australian Rugby Union has failed

    There are so many lessons to learn from the crisis in rugby, it's hard to know where to start. If David Gallop thinks he's under siege, he could ring Bill Pulver. But it's not the similarities which matter. It's the differences. Which is why the mindset of Football Federation Australia remains the key.

    It's hard to avoid the perception that Muddied Oafs' deepest wounds have been self-inflicted. By worshipping on the altar of commercialism since the game turned professional, they've sacrificed their identity, their constituency, and ultimately their participation. More on that later.

    Rugby is shrinking – by all measures – because it's disconnected from its base. That's the moral of the story for the FFA as it approaches an equally critical juncture. Buffeted by a perfect storm of constitutional demands for greater democracy and transparency, a mutiny by A-League owners, a thirst for expansion and a push for a national second division, the FFA has been circling the wagons rather than opening the door. Wrong.

    Ignoring the clamour from the rank-and-file won't solve anything. Instead, embracing them will revitalise, and monetise, the game's greatest asset. It's size. That's how to make sure football doesn't repeat rugby's mistakes. Socialism versus capitalism? I'm backing people power to win in the end.

    There's a credible view that the professional football codes in Australia have reached a tipping point. Rugby may well be the canary in the coalmine. Pay television, which over two decades has morphed sports into industries, faces a difficult future. The gravy train may be pulling into the station.

    Trouble is, too many of those running these sports have become complacent, and narrow-minded. They've come to manage though the one-dimensional prism of broadcast revenue – a small screen version of a much bigger picture. It's become all about the commerce, and little else. The suits and the boots have never been so far apart.

    For the NRL and the AFL, the honeymoon is not yet over because they're still getting over-the-odds from TV. For rugby, though, the balancing act has reached the precipice. And it's left itself with very little to fall back on.

    Strangely enough, it's football – which has never been able to gorge on gigantic broadcast deals – which is best positioned to flourish in the emerging commercial landscape. Why? Because of the numbers. Not the ones on a Whitlam Square spreadsheet, but the ones where it really matters. At a park near you.

    In the last six months, two major surveys have re-confirmed the game's status as a grassroots monolith. Not just in terms of the football codes, but in terms of all of Australia's major sporting pursuits.

    At the end of last year, the federal government's Ausplay survey put club-based participation in football at 1,086,986, or an incredible 18.8 per cent of all participation in the country. For decades, participation numbers of all sports – including football – have been manipulated to suit an argument. This survey has a strong claim for independence, and impartiality. Which is why rival codes such as AFL (625,627) and rugby league (247,883) were unhappy. Rugby? It didn't even make the list.

    A few months later came further proof of football's player power. Roy Morgan Research – based on the looser definition of "regular participation" – still had football as No.1, but it was the trend which raised eyebrows. Comparing the 15-year gap between 2001 (when a similar survey was last completed) and 2016, football's numbers have risen by a whopping 46 per cent. Just nine of 27 sports had increased participation, and only rowing (62 percent) has done better than football since 2001.

    According to the survey, AFL has effectively flat-lined ( -1 per cent) during that period, while rugby league participation has dropped by 27 per cent. Rugby? It's collapsed by 63 per cent, down to just 55,000 players. Not surprisingly, the ARU described the survey as "fake news", but whichever way you cut it, here's a game in crisis. The price to pay for pulling out the roots.

    So that's what the FFA needs to contemplate. The warning signs are clear. The sports of the future will have to look down, not up. People who love their sport need to be engaged, respected, and appreciated. It may not be as easy as pocketing a fat cheque from a broadcaster, but soon it will be the best way forward. For some, the only way.

    Rugby either didn't see what was coming, or didn't want to. It's hard to see how rugby can recover from the damage done. The FFA's challenge is to make a quantum leap of faith, to look beyond the spreadsheet and see the horizon. It's an exciting one if it opens the door, and open its mind. Watch this space.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Non sunt multiplicanda entia sine necessitate

  7. #7
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,508
    vCash
    1296000
    Interesting article.

    I would actually say that rugby has a good chance of engaging the grass roots in the next five years.

    Simply because if they don't start to engage the players in the suburban parks, rugby will cease to exist in Australia.

    I'm assuming that the green jacket brigade are too arrogant to see that, and the game will die in the arse professionally, to be built up by an infinitesimal grass roots player base into a national body that actually cares about people outside of Sydney.

    But by then, I'll be unlikely to care (if I'm still alive)

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  8. #8
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,726
    vCash
    5470000
    I've also considered his point re Pay TV. I can see the possibility of that well drying up as the NBN roll out continues and more people buy digital passes. I think the NRL might owe departed CEO Smith a big thankyou as that occurs. The AFL has to wait years for that revenue stream. Rugby and the A League OTOH are pretty much hitched to Foxtel aren't they?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  9. #9
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,468
    vCash
    460000
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    I've also considered his point re Pay TV. I can see the possibility of that well drying up as the NBN roll out continues and more people buy digital passes. I think the NRL might owe departed CEO Smith a big thankyou as that occurs. The AFL has to wait years for that revenue stream. Rugby and the A League OTOH are pretty much hitched to Foxtel aren't they?
    The A-League gets a small component of it's TV deal from FTA given there is one game per round live (take not ARU) on SBS, but yes the lions share of the cash for the A-League currently comes from Fox.

    I can't see Foxtel being threatened too much unless Digital Passes are allowed on anything bigger than a Tablet. Telstra half own Foxtel so I'll assume there won't be too much pressure for a change there.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by jargan83; 24-04-17 at 15:10.

  10. #10
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,726
    vCash
    5470000
    Quote Originally Posted by jargan83 View Post

    I can't see Foxtel being threatened too much unless Digital Passes are allowed on anything bigger than a Tablet.
    Scuse the tech challenged old fart question....but. You mean if I buy one I can't stream from my NBN connection to a TV.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  11. #11
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,468
    vCash
    460000
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    Scuse the tech challenged old fart question....but. You mean if I buy one I can't stream from my NBN connection to a TV.
    As far as I'm aware the NRL digital pass (and it's AFL equivalent) can only be viewed on a mobile device e.g. a Tablet or a Phone.

    Edit: Laptop devices are also supported but apparently it can detect if you plug it into a TV.

    9. Can I watch live video via the NRL.com Match Centre on my PC?

    No, live streaming on the NRL.com Match Centre is restricted to supported laptop devices. Live video playout to any external device (eg: a PC monitor or TV via direct cable connection, Airplay or Airplay mirroring ) is not allowed
    http://www.nrl.com/News/WatchLIVENRL...7/Default.aspx

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #12
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,726
    vCash
    5470000
    Anyone know where I can pick up a 50" tablet?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #13
    Legend
    Apprentice Bookie
    Contributor .X.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,697
    vCash
    -14799739
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    Anyone know where I can pick up a 50" tablet?
    As far as I know Largest tablet is the apple iPad Pro - 12.9"

    AS far as Digital Passes only available to Mobile devices - I am sure that there are ways around that.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Exile
    Sydney


    "Pain heels. Chicks dig scars and Glory lasts forever." Shane Falco

  14. #14
    Immortal Contributor The InnFORCEr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West Leederville
    Posts
    16,871
    vCash
    3102000
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    Anyone know where I can pick up a 50" tablet?
    http://www.businessinsider.com/micro...-10/?r=AU&IR=T

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?

    Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!

    Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!

  15. #15
    Veteran SNOB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Carramar WA (gods country)!
    Posts
    4,061
    vCash
    3481639
    Quote Originally Posted by Exile View Post
    As far as I know Largest tablet is the apple iPad Pro - 12.9"

    AS far as Digital Passes only available to Mobile devices - I am sure that there are ways around that.
    Can an iPad be connected to a projector? Not sure about sound but can probably be linked to bigger speakers.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    May the FORCE be with you!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. STUBBS JOINS OVERHAULED FORCE BACKLINE
    By The InnFORCEr in forum Western Force
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-11-12, 18:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •