Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: ARU questions clubs amid fears of widening salary cap swindle

  1. #1
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    travelling_gerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    18,483
    vCash
    5084000

    ARU questions clubs amid fears of widening salary cap swindle

    THE Australian Rugby Union has begun interviewing officials from several premiership clubs as part of its investigation into whether an Australian province has breached salary cap restrictions through an elaborate invoicing system.

    The Sun-Herald revealed last month an Australian province was involved in a scheme this year where several of its players were not paid directly by the organisation. Instead the player's club invoiced the province for ''ground hire''.

    The province then paid the amount in cash to the club, which passed it on to the player. This way the player's full earnings do not appear on the province's salary list, while it is used as a way of avoiding taxation.

    Following the initial report, the ARU began an investigation, which is being conducted by one of its leading and most experienced officials, Matt Carroll. Apart from receiving reports from the five Australian provinces, Carroll is interviewing numerous club officials.

    Carroll said yesterday it was uncertain when the ARU inquiry would be completed.

    ''We have made inquiries with the clubs, and that is ongoing. We would like to have this finalised sooner rather than later,'' Carroll said. ''We have also made inquiries with all of the five Australian franchises, and we will continue doing that as part of our investigation.''

    The Herald has been told at least two premiership clubs are involved in the scheme. It is understood the invoices include a sum of $25,000 for a starting Super Rugby player who appeared in the province's back line, and $10,000 to a fringe player, who appeared on the bench as one of the forward back-ups.

    But there are growing concerns more players are involved, and a third, and possibly fourth club could be implicated. One player under suspicion is a well-known forward, who played regularly this season.

    Waratahs chief executive Jason Allen said on Thursday he was unable to comment on this salary cap issue.
    When asked if he could confirm or deny whether the Waratahs were involved in this salary cap breach, Allen said: ''I cannot comment on that situation.'' Allen said only the ARU could comment on the matter.

    The ARU recently confirmed the chief executives of the five Australian provinces have to sign a statutory declaration each year declaring that ''everything involving their player salaries is above board''.

    If a chief executive is then found to have deliberately misled the ARU, the governing body can institute strict penalties, including large fines and a docking of competition points.

    The chief executive's position at the province could also be placed in jeopardy. The investigation could easily hinge on whether the ARU can determine, and then confirm, who within the province actually approved the invoicing scheme.

    The Herald has been told that if the clubs do not provide adequate answers within the next week or so, their controlling body has the power to charge them under the code of conduct for ''bringing the game into disrepute''.

    It is understood the invoicing system was used midway through this season when the Australian province required replacement players to cover several weak spots in its playing squad. It was also at a time when the five provinces were uncertain what the salary cap amount applied by the ARU would be for the following season. It was finally agreed in late May that the Super Rugby teams would have a salary cap of $4.5 million for the next two years.

    After players negotiate with their province, they approach the ARU for a ''top-up'' to their contract. In recent times, the ARU has restricted the number of top-ups.

    The ARU now signs about 35 players, slashing the number from 54 contracts four years ago. The players are ranked in value by Wallabies coach Robbie Deans and ARU high-performance manager David Nucifora before being offered top-ups reflecting their position on the pecking order.

    http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/un...#ixzz22WQUHLOX

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    (a.k.a. Mr Pinkbits) Stone Cold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,327
    vCash
    5000000
    Was the province the Melbourne Storm errr Rebels?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    coz Stone Cold says so

  3. #3
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    66
    vCash
    5000000
    From the interview that growden did I'd say it's the tahs. Wouldn't that be a kick in the teeth.

    NSW = struggle town.
    Posted via Mobile Device

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Veteran sittingbison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    North Freo
    Posts
    2,800
    vCash
    5000000
    Haha hack "journalism" at it's worst.

    Trying desperately hard to NOT implicate the guilty party and by doing so implicate four innocent provinces.

    The Tahs and CEO Allen names suddenly dropped into the article when there was no need to do so (then conveniently going into some irrelevant depth about CEOs being held personally responsible).

    Can't be rabble, they have 10 marquee spots(not all filled??) at only $110k each, no need to cheat.

    Can't be Force, we are so dysfunctional the story would be a lampoon on how we can't even buy a wooden spoon.

    Brums are everyone's favourite success story, can't discredit them.

    So, clearly implying the Tahs, because if it was Reds he couldn't resist dumping on them.

    The next snippet is a mid season addition to roster. Does anyone remember them bringing in a couple of players mid season? They lost Rocky and the other flanker for the season very early on.
    Posted via Mobile Device

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Legend Contributor Alison's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    7,308
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by sittingbison View Post
    Haha hack "journalism" at it's worst.

    Trying desperately hard to NOT implicate the guilty party and by doing so implicate four innocent provinces.

    The Tahs and CEO Allen names suddenly dropped into the article when there was no need to do so (then conveniently going into some irrelevant depth about CEOs being held personally responsible).

    Can't be rabble, they have 10 marquee spots(not all filled??) at only $110k each, no need to cheat.

    Can't be Force, we are so dysfunctional the story would be a lampoon on how we can't even buy a wooden spoon.

    Brums are everyone's favourite success story, can't discredit them.

    So, clearly implying the Tahs, because if it was Reds he couldn't resist dumping on them.

    The next snippet is a mid season addition to roster. Does anyone remember them bringing in a couple of players mid season? They lost Rocky and the other flanker for the season very early on.
    Posted via Mobile Device
    If the article 'just happens' to appear beside a photo of the Tahs or something obv NSW, then there's no doubt. That's a common trick that hacks use to imply something without implying something!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    Legend Contributor blueandblack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    6,099
    vCash
    8946664
    I thought it was the Rebels..or maybe it was the Tahds. I remember reading about this somewhere a little back

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "12 Years a Supporter" starring the #SeaOfBlue

  7. #7
    Veteran Contributor The EnForcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,645
    vCash
    5000000
    Don't worry folks, if it had anything to do with the force then the eastern states press would have been all over us. While the media scumbag focus is pointing in another diction let's hope we just build our club into a fighting machine.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Just happy to be here

  8. #8
    Immortal Contributor The InnFORCEr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    West Leederville
    Posts
    16,903
    vCash
    3128000
    Tahs for sure, CEO Zimmerman has already walked to avoid scrutiny, typical old school tactics. Wonder what the penalty will be?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?

    Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!

    Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!

  9. #9
    Senior Player Hoolly Doolly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Karratha WA
    Posts
    998
    vCash
    5000000
    Definitely the Tahs but surely the Reds need to come under scrutiny with all their resignings.......oh thats right they'll take a paycut so they can sing the song.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #10
    Veteran Contributor The EnForcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,645
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by The InnFORCEr View Post
    Tahs for sure, CEO Zimmerman has already walked to avoid scrutiny, typical old school tactics. Wonder what the penalty will be?
    No doubt it will be something really severe like having to accept another bail out from the ARU and saying "sorry we won't do it again"......in private of course.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Just happy to be here

  11. #11
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    home
    Posts
    2,073
    vCash
    5114000
    Lets be realistic. It can't be the EWF because we don't have senior squad players who are from our clubs (except Longbottom from Rocky). He certainly never appeared in the backline either. We weren't that desperate.
    We could do a Harris-Growden and speculate that it could by Rocky. Wouldn't that be fun
    It is the Tards

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #12
    Champion Contributor todd4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tweed Heads NSW
    Posts
    1,468
    vCash
    6389636
    Quote Originally Posted by travelling_gerry View Post

    If a chief executive is then found to have deliberately misled the ARU, the governing body can institute strict penalties, including large fines and a docking of competition points.


    Docking of competition points? Really?

    The Kiwis and Saffas would if the ARU started docking competition points!

    Our teams find it hard enough to get into finals as it is!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #13
    Player Invictus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Banksia Grove
    Posts
    381
    vCash
    5000000
    As stated by others, if it is the tahs they will get slap on the wrist and told not to do it again. Anyone else and there would be firing squads being formed as we speak.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  14. #14
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    home
    Posts
    2,073
    vCash
    5114000
    Absolutely.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #15
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Belmont
    Posts
    108
    vCash
    5000000
    Tahs bloke said he wasn't allowed to comment-only ARU.He would have spat out an emphatic "no" before stumbling through some bullshit story if he knew for sure it wasn't them.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 31-03-11, 19:28
  2. O'Neill dismisses funding backflip/Struggling clubs must stop pretending
    By AndyS in forum National Rugby Championship (NRC)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17-03-08, 14:30
  3. Elite players vital if revamp is to work, says clubs' rep
    By Burgs in forum National Rugby Championship (NRC)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-01-08, 10:47

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •