Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: SANZAR gives nod to referees to reward attacking teams

  1. #46
    Champion Contributor jazza93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    the beach
    Posts
    2,068
    vCash
    5000000
    The game is evolving, there is not much more too it.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #47
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    22,802
    vCash
    388000
    Mungo "scrums" may as well see the forwards stand around with their arms linked and counting to ten for all the impact they have on the match.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

  3. #48
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Quote Originally Posted by normie View Post
    However, I see nothing wrong with a slightly skewed scrum feed. After all, the team in possession has deservedly got the feed.
    I guess it depends how skewed, League scrums go between the second rowers legs and out before the lock.

    I don't call rolling it inside one foot a scrum feed.

    If it goes down the tunnel and ends up more on one side than the other, surely that's OK, if it's already in the second row without being hooked.....umm....no

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  4. #49
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    Burgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Country WA
    Posts
    22,802
    vCash
    388000
    The old days of a proper feed and dinkum contested hook were far better, should never have been relaxed.
    The team in possession has the benefit of timing the feed, any more than that and there's little point having it and pretendng it to be one part of the great "contested areas" of our code.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "Bloody oath we did!"

    Nathan Sharpe, Legend.

  5. #50
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,546
    vCash
    1338000
    Well, I think it's still a contest, just not a hooker vs hooker contest. Today's scrum is far more a Whole pack v whole pack contest with the loser getting pushed off the ball...I personally don't mind that, neither do I mind the old scrums, I just think they're different animals. If the hooker tried to play in a current scrum, I can't imagine how he'd get his feed forward, Look at the scrums you're talking about Burgs, they're much higher than today and a lot less pressure on the front row to allow the hooker to use both feet if required and the props to support him, It looks to me like everyone else is providing support, rather than pushing with everything they've got.

    Granted it might've turned into a different battle once the ball was at the lock's feet, but that's just another difference, not necessarily a better or worse.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  6. #51
    Champion Contributor jazza93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    the beach
    Posts
    2,068
    vCash
    5000000
    If the ball was fed straight the better scrum would win almost every time. This is a bigger exploit than feeding it crooked. But even if halfbacks were forced to feed it straight they would just spin it in and find more ways to get the same advantage.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #52
    Veteran beige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,515
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by GIGS20 View Post
    If it goes down the tunnel and ends up more on one side than the other, surely that's OK, if it's already in the second row without being hooked.....umm....no
    That's pretty much how I see it.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #53
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Swan View
    Posts
    61
    vCash
    5000000
    the irb web site and video examples is worth a visit particularly the examples they show of binding or lack of it in rolling mauls, obstruction at lineouts and restarts. The clips are only short but show how the laws should be applied.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4

Similar Threads

  1. SANZAR names Super 14 referees
    By travelling_gerry in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 22-01-09, 22:51
  2. The TriNations teams: faster, smarter, harder
    By travelling_gerry in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 30-11-08, 18:04
  3. The ARC and lessons from New Zealand
    By Burgs in forum Articles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-08-08, 22:24
  4. Referees for the next four weeks
    By AndyS in forum Super Rugby
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 19-03-08, 19:00
  5. TV warns: no more B teams
    By Burgs in forum International Rugby
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13-07-07, 19:24

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •