Where will the New Force Hooker Come From

**pieter blackie** · 24-02-10, 17:27

Surely Pek is suitable enough if the Wallabies benched him as hooker

**Woody** · 24-02-10, 18:14

Originally Posted by pieter blackie

Surely Pek is suitable enough if the Wallabies benched him as hooker

And picked by you many many months ago.

**pieter blackie** · 24-02-10, 18:16

Originally Posted by Woody

And picked by you many many months ago.

exactly

**travelling_gerry** · 24-02-10, 18:19

Yeah...those bloody bookies get ya in the end every time....

**Thequeerone** · 27-02-10, 07:08

Pek is not NEW to the Force - they attempted to recruit 2 new Hookers - during the off season - No New Hooker found / contracted. Had the Force said at any stage during the pre-season that they were happy to run with what they had I would have paid out - Pek and Ryan are awesome Hookers

**Timbo** · 27-02-10, 09:15

TQO - the inescapable logic is:

We already had Pek & Ryan, therefore there was no hooker required. We may have been out fishing but it was not required!

I believe a Royal Commission is called for in this matter.

**Thequeerone** · 27-02-10, 11:54

Then why did the Western Force try to recruit at least two new Hookers - I did not tell them to do this I just acted on the facts i.e.e that they tried till the last days before the season started to recruit one.

My personal take on all of this this has been that Pek is not playing in his preferred/ possibly strongest position.

I understand where all of you are coming from and agree now the 3 Hookers we have look ample - then it was so clear

**pieter blackie** · 27-02-10, 13:27

Originally Posted by Thequeerone

I understand where all of you are coming from and agree now the 3 Hookers we have look ample - then it was so clear

So there is a chance of me getting my money

**Thequeerone** · 27-02-10, 15:08

Originally Posted by pieter blackie

So there is a chance of me getting my money

NO

Even you Pieter cannot rewrite the events of pre season

**Timbo** · 27-02-10, 16:21

TQO

One might also ask why we have so many Props - although I for one agree there is no such thing as too many props.

It is handy - because it improves the overall IQ and good looks of the team - but it is not REQUIRED!!

**Thequeerone** · 27-02-10, 16:43

Right Folks I'm closing this thread - I'm not the Western Force - I did not decide has many hookers, props et al were required, nor did I instigate events to facilitate the acquisition of more nor do I pretend to understand the mechanisms of the cerebral matter of those that do

**pieter blackie** · 27-02-10, 21:16

Originally Posted by Thequeerone

NO

Even you Pieter cannot rewrite the events of pre season

Sorry TQ1 but i had to see how far you can be pushed

Outcome	Odds		Total Bets	Total Staked
South Africa	3/1 F	(4.00)	4	13000
New Zealand	4/1	(5.00)	2	10000
Argentina	10/1	(11.00)	3	16000
Mainland Europe (left of Germany)	11/1	(12.00)	0	0
Mainland Europe (right of Germany )	15/1	(16.00)	0	0
England	8/1	(9.00)	2	6000
Ireland	10/1	(11.00)	0	0
Scotland	20/1	(21.00)	0	0
Wales	15/1	(16.00)	1	333
Japan	9/1	(10.00)	1	1000
No suitable Hooker found/contracted	3/1 F	(4.00)	4	13000	WIN!
No Hooker Required	3/1 F	(4.00)	5	76000
Australian - new contract to force not acadamey	4/1	(5.00)	2	6000
A German Hooker for WF2006	100/1	(101.00)	1	1000

Thread: Where will the New Force Hooker Come From

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Similar Threads

Force v Bulls...liveish scores

Western Force Score Bonus Point Win Over Reds

Force tie one on against the Crusaders

Force field around John Mitchell fading

Force v Waratahs LIVE CALL Sat 23rd Sept

Posting Permissions