Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Private equity argument swaying on TV revenue

  1. #1
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    travelling_gerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    18,483
    vCash
    5062000

    Private equity argument swaying on TV revenue

    Wayne Smith | August 17, 2009


    Article from: The Australian

    THE Australian Rugby Union's rationale for introducing private equity into its Super rugby teams could be undermined if rumours of it gaining a significant boost from its cut of the sale of SANZAR broadcast rights prove correct.

    Informed sources have told The Australian that the ARU's income from television rights could increase by anywhere from 25-50 per cent on what it took away from the 2005 broadcast deal.

    The bullish estimates arise not just as a result of SANZAR's decision to expand Super rugby to a 15-team competition in 2011, which will mean not just 33 per cent more product but more product of a highly desirable nature, with two derbies to be played each weekend of the conference phase of the tournament.

    But, for the first time, Fox Sports could be facing a serious challenge from a free-to-air network, with Ten apparently keen to grab the Super 15 rights for its high definition sports channel.

    The channel is aggressively pursuing top-line sport, having already secured the rights to the 2010 Delhi and 2014 Glasgow Commonwealth Games, Formula One motor racing, the Indian Premier League
    Twenty20cricket as well as to swimming and netball.

    At the end of June, the SANZAR partners, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand, submitted their broadcast proposal to News Corporation (publisher of The Australian), which has 60 days in which to respond. The deadline is less than a fortnight away.

    It is understood that if News significantly increases its offer from the $US323million it paid under the last broadcast deal, the ARU - which received 28 per cent of the total then but stands to take one-third of the new agreement after South Africa struck a separate deal for the sale of its Currie Cup and June inbound Tests - will stick with its current broadcast partners.

    But if the offer at the end of the month falls short of expectations, the ARU now has the option of going to the market and exploiting the competitive tension between Fox and One HD.

    Neither Fox spokesman Tony Sinclair nor his Ten/One counterpart, Jeanette McLoughlin, would discuss the Super rugby TV rights issue.

    If the broadcast deal does deliver a windfall to the ARU, the union's argument for introducing private equity would lose much of its strength. Certainly, it would encounter real resistance from the states if it attempts to force them down the private equity route by cutting off entirely or even scaling down its current annual $4.3m allocations to the Waratahs, Reds, Brumbies and Western Force.

    Reportedly, the ARU's cut of TV rights last year amounted to $22.8m, with a further $2.2m earned by hedging on the exchange rates, the contract having been settled in US dollars.

    Even a modest 20 per cent rise in broadcast income would amount to an extra $5m, which would allow the ARU to pay its annual allocations to the existing Super teams as well as to the new Melbourne franchise and still have $3.5m in reserve.

    The more revenue generated by the sale of broadcast rights, the less sway the ARU would have as it attempts to sell the private equity idea to the already reluctant states.



    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...015651,00.html

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Veteran beige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,515
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by travelling_gerry View Post
    the ARU - which received 28 per cent of the total then but stands to take one-third of the new agreement after South Africa struck a separate deal for the sale of its Currie Cup and June inbound Tests
    I hope so. Doesn't name any sources again though...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #3
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Lets wait in hope that the ARU receive enough to then go on and fund a new national comp ARC and Australia A in the Pacific Nations cup...

    The national comp is now well over due...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,018
    vCash
    4084000
    whats vthe ads like on One? I have got digital up and running yet.

    Is it very intrusive?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,468
    vCash
    460000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post
    Lets wait in hope that the ARU receive enough to then go on and fund a new national comp ARC and Australia A in the Pacific Nations cup
    In that order preferably

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,726
    vCash
    5470000
    Quote Originally Posted by mudskipper View Post

    The national comp is now well over due...
    Let's hope a deal can be put together with OneHD. They are unlikely to out muscle Fox for exclusive live S15 rights. Maybe they could chase an deal which gives split rights similar to the current NRL & AFL deals. Some level of FTA coverage should be the #1 priority for the ARU going into the new contract, re-play rights at the least. OneHD may even look at an ARC style set-up if they are "agressively chasing content."

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  7. #7
    Veteran mudskipper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,952
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    Let's hope a deal can be put together with OneHD. They are unlikely to out muscle Fox for exclusive live S15 rights. Maybe they could chase an deal which gives split rights similar to the current NRL & AFL deals. Some level of FTA coverage should be the #1 priority for the ARU going into the new contract, re-play rights at the least. OneHD may even look at an ARC style set-up if they are "agressively chasing content."
    I agree... nows the time to do a AUS comp media deal... I hope JON is up to it because I'm a little worried he's not got it in him...

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Similar Threads

  1. Private owners to rescue the Reds
    By travelling_gerry in forum Queensland Reds
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-08-09, 16:52
  2. How private equity might work
    By jargan83 in forum Rugby
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26-04-08, 00:43
  3. ARU to open Super rugby to private investment
    By KenyaQuin in forum Rugby
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 18-04-08, 21:57

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •