Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: Matt Giteau the answer at halfback for Wallabies, says John Connolly

  1. #1
    Immortal Contributor
    Moderator
    travelling_gerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    18,483
    vCash
    5084000

    Matt Giteau the answer at halfback for Wallabies, says John Connolly

    Wayne Smith | August 11, 2009

    Article from: The Australian

    FORMER Wallabies coach John Connolly says the moment has arrived for his successor Robbie Deans to consider reviving the promising 2006 experiment of using Matt Giteau at halfback.

    Pressure is mounting on Deans for a change at halfback after Luke Burgess again put his side under unnecessary pressure with wayward passes in the weekend's Tri-Nations Test against the Springboks in Cape Town.

    His erratic service directly cost the Wallabies three points at Newlands when hooker Stephen Moore was isolated having to scramble back to collect one of his errant passes in the 12th minute, allowing Morne Steyn to kick his third penalty goal. But the price could have been as high as 10 points, with another misdirected Burgess pass killing a highly promising attack early in the second half.

    It was Deans who made Burgess a Wallaby and he has stuck to him, believing he can develop into a world-class halfback. But in the Wallabies' two Tri-Nations Tests so far this season, the Waratahs No 9 has struggled to provide any real direction from the ruckbase, and his combination with five-eighth Giteau is so laboured it creaks.

    It would be unfair to lay the blame for Giteau's own unimposing form at the feet of Burgess, but the Wallabies cannot afford to have their point-of-difference player not making a difference.
    The simplest option would be for Deans to substitute Will Genia for Burgess at halfback, a switch that worked well for Australia in the final 25 minutes in Cape Town.

    Indeed, rather than limiting himself to that straight swap, Deans could go the whole way, installing this year's Reds pairing of Genia and Berrick Barnes as his new halves pairing and moving Giteau out to his original Test position, inside centre.
    Barnes won a host of new admirers for the way he took charge of proceedings at key moments in Cape Town, most especially in the brief period Australia was down to 13 men on either side of halftime.

    So well did he direct operations that the Springboks scarcely had a chance to exploit their numerical advantage.
    Before his successor went down that path, Connolly said, he should at least re-examine restoring Giteau to halfback - the position he filled in all four Tests of the 2006 spring tour.

    "The dilemma is that Giteau is the best 9 (halfback), 10 (five-eighth) and 12 (inside centre)," Connolly said. "But as a halfback, his good left boot means the Wallabies don't have to pass the ball backwards before putting it into touch."

    As vital as Giteau's kicking game could yet be at halfback, especially with the box kick now, regrettably, dominating proceedings, the best argument that can be made for the switch is a statistical one.
    If Giteau is, as most critics would agree, Australia's best and most dangerous player, he needs to have the ball in his hands more than any other player. And the place for that is halfback.

    The IRB's Game Analysis of last year's Tri-Nations series reveals the Wallabies halfback had the ball in hand more than anyone else in the entire tournament. A total of 397 passes - 46 per cent of all passes thrown by the Wallabies in the series - were made by the halfback.

    As for sceptics who think the best playmaker should always be at five-eighth, the Springboks are doing very nicely with the world's best player, Fourie du Preez, at halfback.
    Ultimately, Connolly realised the best use of his slender resources was to stick with Giteau at inside centre for the 2007 World Cup and continue with George Gregan at halfback, but the 2006 experiment, while discontinued, was anything but a failure.
    As radical as Connolly's suggestion might be, a Wallabies 9-10-12 combination of Giteau, Barnes and James O'Connor at inside centre would be a handful for opposing defences. All three pose a genuine running and kicking threat.

    It may be that with Deans already having to find a new centre combination following the loss of injured skipper Stirling Mortlock he does not want to feed more changes than necessary into the system.

    Even installing O'Connor at fullback to release Adam Ashley-Cooper to replace Mortlock at outside centre brings more than enough upheaval.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...015651,00.html

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Legend Court Reporter
    Contributor
    James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bridgetown, WA
    Posts
    6,110
    vCash
    22000
    If feels weird and uncomfortable to admit it but I actually agree with Connolly here. Barnes has seemed at lot better and more competant than Giteau at running the show. He was pretty awesome in the time we had only 13 men at keeping things under control. Burgess has had one good performance this year and needs to be dropped. Maybe not for the 3Ns but I'd give it a go on the Euro tour.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.

  3. #3
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,503
    vCash
    514000
    9. Genia
    10. Barnes

    12. Giteau

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Legend Contributor brokendown gunfighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    wembley
    Posts
    8,047
    vCash
    5394000
    Quote Originally Posted by jargan83 View Post
    9. Genia
    10. Barnes

    12. Giteau


    agree

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Veteran zimeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    3,128
    vCash
    5000000
    Gits has one poor game and everyone wants him to move to every weak spot in the team.. cmon guys play him where hes at his strongest.. 12 is perfect for him always has been. 10 is the next best and 9 .. well whats wrong with Genia? Valentine?

    Burgess has never been my favorite, his passing is up shyte creek but i wouldnt move gits there at the expense of the back line.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,788
    vCash
    5520000
    Quote Originally Posted by jargan83 View Post
    9. Genia
    10. Barnes

    12. Giteau


    ......
    13. Cross
    15. AAC

    16. JOC

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  7. #7
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,503
    vCash
    514000
    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    ......
    13. Cross
    15. AAC

    16. JOC
    You want JO'C to be the replacement hooker?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Legend Contributor Thequeerone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wanneroo
    Posts
    5,348
    vCash
    5000000
    I'd like to see that

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    61 years between Grand Slams Was the wait worth it - Ya betta baby

  9. #9
    Champion Contributor Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    At JB"s, well at least in spirit.
    Posts
    1,913
    vCash
    5000000
    christ i wouldn't

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    War is Gods may of teaching Americans Geography

  10. #10
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    15,788
    vCash
    5520000
    Quote Originally Posted by jargan83 View Post
    You want JO'C to be the replacement hooker?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David


  11. #11
    Legend Court Reporter
    Contributor
    James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bridgetown, WA
    Posts
    6,110
    vCash
    22000
    Quote Originally Posted by zimeric View Post
    Gits has one poor game and everyone wants him to move to every weak spot in the team.. cmon guys play him where hes at his strongest.. 12 is perfect for him always has been. 10 is the next best and 9 .. well whats wrong with Genia? Valentine?

    Burgess has never been my favorite, his passing is up shyte creek but i wouldnt move gits there at the expense of the back line.
    It's nothing personal to Gits. It's not even about him playing a poor game. It's simply the way the game seems to be going. Genia looks the goods but doesn't have as much test experience and I haven't really seen him kick yet (not that that's a bad thing just an unknown). Barnes just seems to be more natural in the 10 role. Now if Giteau and Barnes did a straight swap I think that'd also be good I just think Giteau at 9 seems to work because it allows for a bigger 12 to handle the bigger 12s everyone else seems to be using in test rugby these days.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.

  12. #12
    Player
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    248
    vCash
    5000000
    Genia is a MUCH better 9 than Giteau. Genia has the best pass I've seen on any Australian player and is as good a runner and tackler as Bugess IMO. People have bemoaned this yeatr that Giteau's long ball is not even good enough for a 10, so how is the answer to play him at 9??

    Agree with those above who suggest a Genia-Barnes-Giteau halves combo.

    Suspect AAC will move to 13 and JOC in at 15.

    Poor old Crossy hasn't had the opportunities this year and with AAC's form I doubt Deans would drop him to the bench.

    ---------- Post added at 12:39 ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 ----------

    Cross will defo be coming in on the bench though

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #13
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,540
    vCash
    1334000
    Quote Originally Posted by jargan83 View Post
    9. Genia
    10. Barnes

    12. Giteau
    If only i could praise more than once for a single post!

    I'm impressed by Conolly's remarkable ability to miss the obvious, even when he's stated it in the article......no wonder the Wallabies failed under him.

    ---------- Post added at 12:23 ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by shasta View Post
    replacement halfback isn't much better!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  14. #14
    Veteran laura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The Sticks
    Posts
    4,139
    vCash
    5000000
    9. Genia
    10. Barnes
    11. Mitchell
    12. Giteau
    13. Cross
    14. Hynes/Turner
    15. AAC

    20. Valentine
    21. Hynes/Turner
    22. JOC

    Genia & Barnes have played alongside each other more than Genia & Gits have, and Gits & Crossy have also worked together. I think keeping the partnerships that they have already developed would work better than trying to form new ones at this stage.

    Alternatively:
    9. Valentine
    10. Giteau
    11. Mitchell
    12. Barnes
    13. AAC
    14. Hynes/Turner
    15. JOC

    20. Genia
    21. Cross
    22. Hynes/Turner

    Obviously Valo would have to be re-called for either to happen but he and Gits work well together and if he came in at scrumhalf I think Gits' performance at 10 would improve. In the case of JOC needing to leave the field AAC would move to fullback and Crossy would come in at 13. AAC and JOC can both play fullback and AAC and Crossy can both play 13 so it makes sense for all 3 to be included in the team somewhere.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #15
    Legend Contributor Thequeerone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wanneroo
    Posts
    5,348
    vCash
    5000000
    OK you are all going to crucify me here but if it didn't work for the Force why would it work for the Wallabies.

    I'm definitely pro force but the backs did not exactly convert the procession they received this year my personal thoughts on that centre around leadership.

    (please block this post so Mudskipper can't see this)

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by Thequeerone; 11-08-09 at 19:15.
    61 years between Grand Slams Was the wait worth it - Ya betta baby

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23-07-09, 17:31
  2. Million Dollar Baby
    By Evie in forum Matt Giteau
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25-06-07, 06:40
  3. Matt Giteau - The Profile
    By Evie in forum Matt Giteau
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-10-06, 19:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •