Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 70

Thread: AFL urges Barnett to build $1.1b stadium

  1. #31
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,261
    vCash
    5106000
    Quote Originally Posted by Swee_82 View Post
    I wouldn't care if we had to play on a school field if it meant I could see what was happening on the far sideline without the aid of binoculars.
    And that may even go for most people here too, but I am not so sure about the other 27,000 punters that show up to the matches. How many members have substandard facilities already driven away? If there were even less parking, less food, less toilet facilities, no big screen and everyone had to sit at the end of the ground because the corporates took all the pitchside seats....?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #32
    Veteran Swee_82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,151
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyS View Post
    And that may even go for most people here too, but I am not so sure about the other 27,000 punters that show up to the matches. How many members have substandard facilities already driven away? If there were even less parking, less food, less toilet facilities, no big screen and everyone had to sit at the end of the ground because the corporates took all the pitchside seats....?
    Maybe I'm the wrong person to be championing the cause- I don't care about the food line or the beer line (you're only there for 2 hours max), haven't found myself in an overly long queue outside the WC, don't expect to be able to drive to any games that attract crowds bigger than an interstate cricket match (and even then not to a Twenty20- too many people). Perhaps, like the Stadium Taskforce report says I'm one of those West Aussies who 'don't even know what a great stadium is'. Then again, I'm from Sydney, have been to the Olympic Stadium many times, though only to the SFS once I think, and know that building a big-ass 'modern' stadium doesn't solve those problems.

    The big screen, though not essential to the game, is probably part of the wider 'experience', or at the very least, something to sell advertising on (forgive my cynacism)

    I've no doubt we won't go anywhere unless the corporates are catered for, but while I've not been talking to RugbyWA myself- I'm just the proverbial-kicking worker monkey; I know others have and I suspect we'd have got a big STFU if we were heading in a direction they didn't want to know about.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by Swee_82; 22-09-08 at 13:46.

  3. #33
    (formerly known as Coach) Your Humble Servant Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    14,228
    vCash
    266778
    A six seater open Box is almost 10 grand! - those suites will be a bit more than that I'd imagine!

    Open Boxes:
    Seat 4 $6,360
    Seat 6 $9,540
    Seat 8 $12,720
    Seat 10 $15,900
    Seat 12 $19,080

    Black Swan Bar / Premium Dining (for 10)
    Season $30,400
    Per Game $5,500

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #34
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,508
    vCash
    522000
    Quote Originally Posted by NTT View Post
    MES needs at least $150 million spent to get it close to what RugbyWA needs for seating, corporates, lighting, parking and other facilities.
    If they have to spend that much you would think it would make more sense to build a new ground? Do i need to mention skilled stadium was built in about 18 months for about $200 million?

    There isn't a lot of room around MES, bulldoze Belmont Park Racecourse and build it there, it doesnt look like it used very often.

    Of course we will end up with yet another quality West Australian half arsed approach

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyS View Post
    And that may even go for most people here too, but I am not so sure about the other 27,000 punters that show up to the matches. How many members have substandard facilities already driven away? If there were even less parking, less food, less toilet facilities, no big screen and everyone had to sit at the end of the ground because the corporates took all the pitchside seats....?
    Food and drink doesnt affect me, i rarely get a feed or a drink at subi 1. becasue i'm usually nicely toasted already and 2. the lines are too freakin long and 3. I dont much feel like going for a 3km trek through the stadium to find either one. Obviously though the average punter may want a feed or a drink so unfortunately it is something that would have to be looked at. The A-League games have a portable big screen, so does the WACA when International cricket is being played so I can't see that being too much of an issue. It would rather shithouse if all the corporate seats got the good seats down the touchlines

    Quote Originally Posted by Swee_82 View Post
    don't expect to be able to drive to any games that attract crowds bigger than an interstate cricket match (and even then not to a Twenty20- too many people). Perhaps, like the Stadium Taskforce report says I'm one of those West Aussies who 'don't even know what a great stadium is'. Then again, I'm from Sydney, have been to the Olympic Stadium many times, though only to the SFS once I think, and know that building a big-ass 'modern' stadium doesn't solve those problems.
    parking at sports events is just asking for trouble, i rarely drive to them, and if i do, i'm usually to drunk to care how long the trip home takes

    I have been to the olympic stadium twice, SFS several times, Suncorp Stadium (which is the best in the land if you ask me) once and nothing in Perth even comes close to matching any of those venues, even as far as ovals go i have been to the SCG a few times and it s**ts all over subiaco oval. How can Perth be so far behind the east coast in terms of stuff like this??

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by jargan83; 22-09-08 at 14:38.

  5. #35
    Champion NTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    location location
    Posts
    2,209
    vCash
    5000000
    i don't know the exact cost of each Coach but i know for certain RugbyWA makes a killing off them and would like a stadium with a similar number of suites when they do move.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #36
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,508
    vCash
    522000
    Quote Originally Posted by NTT View Post
    i don't know the exact cost of each Coach but i know for certain RugbyWA makes a killing off them and would like a stadium with a similar number of suites when they do move.
    it would be a bad business decision if they did anyway, i want a rectangualr stadium, but i dont want RugbyWA to have to suffer, or put up the prices for the average punter which is how they would probably go about recouping some of that money

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #37
    Champion NTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    location location
    Posts
    2,209
    vCash
    5000000
    Bullshit bulldoze the Belmont Park Racecourse : A its privately owned B The TAB contributes too much to state Tax revenue and C it would put 20 000 people out of work, but well thought through none the less.

    You got to look at the stadium issue from what RugbyWA needs and i know for certain that an upgraded MES is a passable quick fix from a RugbyWA viewpoint but its definitely not ideal. I mean its all well and good stating what individuals want but not to the detriment of the overall picture. As i stated earlier Stookies mates with the new sports minister Terry Waldron? and RugbyWA should do well out of this election result.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #38
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,508
    vCash
    522000
    Quote Originally Posted by NTT View Post
    Bullshit bulldoze the Belmont Park Racecourse : A its privately owned B The TAB contributes too much to state Tax revenue and C it would put 20 000 people out of work, but well thought through none the less.
    Privately owned isn't a big deal, there are private owned houses near subiaco oval that the governnment was going to aquire for the new ground. 20,000 is a big number, i fail to see that many people being out of a job

    just a quick edit, is that possibly why they never got beyond talking about plans to build a "super-stadium" there about 5 or 6 years ago??

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by jargan83; 22-09-08 at 14:56.

  9. #39
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,547
    vCash
    1340000
    Quote Originally Posted by NTT View Post
    What RugbyWA ideally needs is a rectangular stadium that has seating for 35 000 and corporate suites numbering about 75.
    There is 70 odd corporate suites at subiaco which RugbyWA has groups on waiting lists for as these are usually the first packages to sell-out each season. The current MES only has around 10 corporate suites. So if RugbyWA sells 70 odd corporate suites at $10 000 thats $700 000 and if the MES upgrade goes ahead at only $25 - 30 million then there would only be an additional 10 corporate suites built meaning 20 suites sold at $10 000 is $200 000. So even if the $25 - 30 million MES upgrade goes ahead to 25 000 seats, the corporate suite situation will leave RugbyWA $500 000 a year worse off instantly. So don't be surprised if RugbyWA is only lukewarm on this upgrade option. MES needs at least $150 million spent to get it close to what RugbyWA needs for seating, corporates, lighting, parking and other facilities.
    The basis of the MES proposal from TOV was essentially an upgrade to corporate facilities, they were only throwing another 6000 odd seats at it mate.

    AFAIK RugbyWA would be served by the MES proposal (although I do admit, it's a bit of a stop gap) Essentially the MES option was considered by WNC committee to be the best we had any shot of getting under the previous government, since we had a reasonable case that they had breached a (albeit impled) contract with the fans by not doing it.

    I guess all bets are off ATM until we see what sort of a commitment the current government wishes to make. I hope the work we've done with Barry House won't be lost and we might get some sort of a seat at that table to represent the fans, because as you so clearly pointed out RugbyWA are stuffed without the corporate dollar, the fans do actually come second to them......It sucks but I'm a pragmatist!

    After reading Jargan's post about Belmont Park, I'm reminded about the Burswood Option.......Private developer, close to the train, GEH and the tunnel right next door and close to a really expensive hotel for the rich and famous.....Surely the Liberals would be a lot happier about a deal like that than Labour.

    I mean it is really hard to tell the difference these days but the socialists would've said no simply because it wasn't state owned woudn't they?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Last edited by GIGS20; 22-09-08 at 15:28. Reason: Answering Jargan
    C'mon the

  10. #40
    Champion NTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    location location
    Posts
    2,209
    vCash
    5000000
    The size of the Racing Industry would make it ny-on impossible to take on, it is a billion dollar industry afterall. It employs everyone from jockeys to cleaners, trainers to totalisator attendants. Plus Perth Racing are going to start they're $2.5 billion development of the whole riverside area there by building something like 8500 apartments, pubs, shops etc.

    Im not saying that RugbyWA won't go to MES, don't get me wrong. I was just painting the picture of what the RugbyWA ideal stadium would feature, 35 000 seats and plenty of corporate facilities. If only the government would throw $500 million at RugbyWA and let it build the stadium everyone wants.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  11. #41
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,547
    vCash
    1340000
    I'm SURE we don't need 500 Mill to build the right stadium NTT. I reckon we could get out of it for half that!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  12. #42
    Champion NTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    location location
    Posts
    2,209
    vCash
    5000000
    yeah then pocket the rest !!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  13. #43
    (formerly known as Coach) Your Humble Servant Darren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Posts
    14,228
    vCash
    266778
    if we only spent half, the remaining 250million would be enough for all current Force members to have a gold membership for the next 30 years....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  14. #44
    Champion NTT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    location location
    Posts
    2,209
    vCash
    5000000
    or tv screens in the back of the seats in front of them for instant replays aswell as 20 yr diamond memberships

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #45
    Immortal Contributor jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    10,554
    vCash
    5000000
    fuck that. spend the other $250 mil screwing the WAFC for all the shit we have endured because of them!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Build a rectangular stadium
    By chiselhead in forum Western Force
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 25-02-08, 10:09
  2. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-08-07, 18:39
  3. Build the stadium - Tourism WA
    By NewsBot in forum Stadiums
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-07, 19:41
  4. Taskforce unveils new stadium plans
    By Burgs in forum Front Page News
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-06-07, 23:21
  5. Perth's New Super Stadium
    By Darren in forum Stadiums
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 24-07-06, 17:50

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •