Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: bristol refuse to release barbarians captain Mark Regan

  1. #1
    Legend Contributor slomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yanchep...
    Posts
    5,368
    vCash
    208000

    bristol refuse to release barbarians captain Mark Regan


    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Senior Player Contributor hopep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Leederville
    Posts
    592
    vCash
    5000000
    I'll definitely need to find a place to watch the game, both teams look interesting.
    As for Regan, I still don't get why England teams won't release players for interanationals. You'd think with England rugby in a mess - can't win a tournament for love nor money - the poms would sort it out.

    They get nothing good out of it. The player is disgruntled and is likely to underperform, they get a black mark from the national body, and the spectators and sponsors have another 'administrative twat' to blame.

    Who wins ?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  3. #3
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,497
    vCash
    502000
    over in England it's getting to the point of where it's like Football (soccer) where clubs wont release players for internationals or when they do they bitch and moan about it

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Veteran Ecky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,891
    vCash
    5004000
    Remember The Good Old Days? When players treated selection for the Baa Baas as an honour, and something to strive for?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #5
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,260
    vCash
    5104000
    Agreed, but to be honest I don't think they should be playing Baa Baa games during anyones season - I know if Gits missed the Force/Crusaders match because he was playing for the Barbarians, I'd be fairly underwhelmed.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    Immortal jargan83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth Capital
    Posts
    21,497
    vCash
    502000
    true, but theres so much club rugby in England/Europe with all the various competitions, they've got to fit it in somewhere

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #7
    Champion KenyaQuin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,264
    vCash
    5000000
    I think in the next couple of seasons, if not sooner, the BaaBaas selection pool will diminish further eventuating in a defunct tour side, especially if they (unions/IRB) proceed with a single international season.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Legend Contributor slomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yanchep...
    Posts
    5,368
    vCash
    208000
    the ba bars and the lions are the only 2 traditional sides still playing at international level, but for how much longer?? id much rather watch an open running game that the bar bars play as opposed to the drivel thats played in the guiness premiership.....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #9
    Legend Contributor
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,260
    vCash
    5104000
    So you are saying friendlies are the way to go rather than tests, as teams will run and throw when there is nothing riding on it?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #10
    Legend Contributor slomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yanchep...
    Posts
    5,368
    vCash
    208000
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyS View Post
    So you are saying friendlies are the way to go rather than tests, as teams will run and throw when there is nothing riding on it?

    RWC 2007 final was boring as bat shit!! where as the 3/4 play off was one of the best games played, youve got to find a happy medium....

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  11. #11
    Player Contributor Flat-top's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    399
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by jargan83 View Post
    over in England it's getting to the point of where it's like Football (soccer) where clubs wont release players for internationals or when they do they bitch and moan about it
    That's not the case at all...there is no equivalent in soccer for the Barbarians for a start.

    The English RFU have only recently reached agreement with clubs, this agreement has dealt with the national game but not "barbarian friendlies".

    This particular fixture is taking place on the same weekend as the EDF Cup (English & Welsh Clubs) and less than a week before some of the players originally selected for the BaaBaa's would be involved in European Cup games. The fans have to be considered and I for one am glad that my team has refused to field a weakened side on Friday even if it means the BaaBaa's lose out.

    Jargan you say that "it has to be fitted in somewhere" because of the fixture congestion, I don't agree and the crowds we are getting in the European Leagues tend to support my case...who exactly wants this friendly? The SA's are not match fit and the organisers can't shift the tickets! I think you are holding on to some sort of romantic ideal of how the BaaBaa's games of old used to be, the professional age has made that something almost impossible to sustain.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  12. #12
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    20,533
    vCash
    1322000
    I hear your argument FT, but rugby is a game, primarily, of tradition surely the Baa Baas is one tradition which should be held on to.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  13. #13
    Player Contributor Flat-top's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    399
    vCash
    5000000
    Quote Originally Posted by GiteauIsGunnaScoreTwenty View Post
    I hear your argument FT, but rugby is a game, primarily, of tradition surely the Baa Baas is one tradition which should be held on to.
    I can't argue with that sentiment but I am a realist and it doesn't take an expert to work out that these issues were always going to surface if the fixture was crow-barred into the callendar on this week...I think the naivety is with the BaaBaa's selectors who must have known they couldn't rely on the release of key players from the NH, part of me thinks they included them just to wind up the issue once again.

    By the way as a Bath supporter who watched Mark Regan and his Bristol side thumped last weekend with him, the great Bristol tallisman being taken off in desperation with 10 minutes to go, I am not convinced that his omission from the BaaBaa's is such a loss...I think your much used description of a whinging Pom has rarely suited someone.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  14. #14
    Senior Player Contributor hopep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Leederville
    Posts
    592
    vCash
    5000000
    Now Flat Top, you can't have it both ways. First you say the clubs are right as hes a key player and it would weaken their team, then you say he's (next to) useless - then why not release him.

    No the arguement about the relevance of Barbarian games and where they get fixtured in - thats good. I had not considered that view, but will in future.

    My gripe with English rugby was that they followed the 'soccer' model when they went professional. That is - the club owns the player and contract, the national team 'requests' a release. yes, the money and popularity is different but thats essentially my reading of the set-up. But International rugby has developed around Tests. Where the very best of two nations compete in a 'test' to see whos rugby is the best. Not, whose 'available on the day if we can afford to rent them' on the day.

    Yes, Barbarian games are different. But to be invited you have to be considered excellent in International terms. Its a great honour. To refuse that honour because "I have regular work on that day" (profesional team commitment) is a bit rude.

    Its a bit like me being invited to play for a TWF 15 on a mid-week 'freindly' against the Force, or a visiting International school boys team. Then my boss turning around and saying 'no you can't go' - I know what I would choose to do. But Regan is contracted, and the English Rugby clubs, in a similar vein to the soccer clubs, buy/own/sell (& bully) players as a commodity - not as people. That's where my gripe with the English system comes from.

    If Reagan had said "thanks for the invite, I'm honoured but can't make it" that would be different. But after he's selected the club jumps up - perhaps it the ERU offered a payment, would that make the matter go away - then its only about money (again, player is a commodity only).

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  15. #15
    Legend Contributor slomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yanchep...
    Posts
    5,368
    vCash
    208000
    regan will captain baa baas no matter what bristol say ......

    REGAN NAMED AS CAPTAIN\.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_union/7114837.stm

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Laws of Rugby - Law 21 - Penalty and Free Kicks
    By Darren in forum The Laws of Rugby
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-07-07, 14:37
  2. Laws of Rugby - Law 18 - Mark
    By Darren in forum The Laws of Rugby
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-07-07, 14:00

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •