Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Cheetahs and King off to the now Pro 14

  1. #1
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,832
    vCash
    5042000

    Cheetahs and King off to the now Pro 14

    Should be sorted out in the next day or so


    Something should be here soon - http://www.pro12rugby.com/

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Immortal Contributor shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Mandurah
    Posts
    10,870
    vCash
    5392000
    The Bronze Star of Faith TWF Contributor!
    The sun will rise in the East tomorrow

    Should be something here soon - http://www.meteorology.com.au/local-forecast/wa/perth

    3 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    "The main difference between playing League and Union is that now I get my hangovers on Monday instead of Sunday - Tom David

  3. #3
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,832
    vCash
    5042000

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Champion Tazzmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,286
    vCash
    5392000
    And the rumblings are now starting in the Northern Hemisphere with them possibly being forced into a conference type system with not all the teams playing each other home and away.......sound familiar


    "Just when you thought it safe to start believing in the future of northern hemisphere rugby, along come the blazers with another hair-brained scheme.

    No, we’re not talking about the plans to streamline future British & Irish Lions tour, nor Premiership Rugby’s desire to extend the season “in the interests of player welfare”. This one is even more maniacal.

    The latest wheeze is a proposed expansion of the PRO12, with the Southern Kings and the Cheetahs set to accept an invite it join the competition from as early as September.

    But don’t worry! Players will not have to spend half the season traversing the Sahara, nor will they expected to play more rugby. The revamp will see the league divided into two conferences of seven teams, with one South African side in each camp.

    And it doesn’t end there. An American side could join from the 2018/19 season “as the competition continues to explore expansion options to generate more revenue and tap into new markets”.

    Genius, right? Well, of course not. Even a part-time fan of our game could tell you why it is that the Kings and the Cheetahs find themselves at a loose end, and that’s because Super Rugby has decided to shape up by cutting some of the dead wood.

    So how could expansion work north of the equator after having failed so miserably in the south?

    And how does fewer home games square with the fans and the finances of existing sides?

    And how much real benefit will the new South African TV deal bring? Won’t the reported (and pretty paltry) extra £11 million be swallowed by airfares alone?

    And why would South Africans tune in to watch the PRO14 after it has been framed, by pure design, as secondary to Super Rugby?

    And what’s the logic behind doing away with traditional/ancient home-and-away derbies by separating sides into conferences? (As it stands, Munster, the Scarlets and the Blues will be in one group, Leinster, the Ospreys and the Dragons in the other.)

    And what if the South African sides win qualification for European competition? Could the Cheetahs of Bloemfontein really become champions of Europe?

    Yes, we’re living in the Age of Stupid, but surely that’s just one step too far."

    Planet Rugby

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    The Force Onwards and Upwards

  5. #5
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    16,438
    vCash
    1028000
    The Bronze Star of Faith
    Two conferences might work quite nicely though. If a true conference system is implemented, that would mean that each conference would have a complete finals series and select a winner, who will play the winner of the other conference in a grand final.

    More finals matches, more teams, more product to market.

    It needn't even cancel the home and away derbies that some teams love so much.....in a genuine conference system, each conference is responsible for whatever the hell they want. One conference could decide to play twice as many games as the other.....no impact, because they only have one grand final spot.

    The issue is not that conferences is a bad idea, it's a great idea that has been implemented so badly, that we're not doing conferences at all in Super Rugby, we're doing some half-assed semi round robin with a bit of trickery to make sure that 2 south african teams are guaranteed a place in the finals rather than one.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Champion Contributor sandgroperrugby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Queensland
    Posts
    1,582
    vCash
    5376000
    TWF Contributor!
    So does-

    It is believed that one of the conditions is that the two South African teams must commit to continue to strengthen their sides, in order to up hold integrity of the competition and to remain competitive.

    -Mean that the South Africans will stack these teams with some better players from the other teams? I am sure this will be watched closely and if so will clearly state the future of where South Africa see themselves.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Generally speaking you aren’t learning much if your lips are moving!!!

  8. #8
    Immortal GIGS20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rockingham
    Posts
    16,438
    vCash
    1028000
    The Bronze Star of Faith
    or does
    Quote Originally Posted by sandgroperrugby View Post
    It is believed that one of the conditions is that the two South African teams must commit to continue to strengthen their sides, in order to up hold integrity of the competition and to remain competitive.
    it just mean that we don't want it to appear that we can take teams that have been assessed as not up to the standard of Southern Hemisphere rugby and expect them to do OK in our comp.

    I'm sure that the press releases praising the improvement in <insert Kings or Cheetahs name here>'s performance when they make (or win) the finals series, regardless of whether there has been any change in their roster or capability.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    C'mon the

  9. #9
    Champion Contributor sandgroperrugby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Queensland
    Posts
    1,582
    vCash
    5376000
    TWF Contributor!
    Quote Originally Posted by GIGS20 View Post
    or does

    it just mean that we don't want it to appear that we can take teams that have been assessed as not up to the standard of Southern Hemisphere rugby and expect them to do OK in our comp.

    I'm sure that the press releases praising the improvement in <insert Kings or Cheetahs name here>'s performance when they make (or win) the finals series, regardless of whether there has been any change in their roster or capability.
    No the press release from the kings will read. The kings are developing their team of young players and are taking heart out of beating the 2014 winning finalist Waratahs (laden with Wallabies) this season in Sydney. Or something among those lines.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Similar Threads

  1. Martin Luther King
    By The Lone Hydrangea in forum Geek Speak
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-07-07, 18:32
  2. Waratahs to sound out King
    By Burgs in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 18-06-07, 14:59
  3. Tahs turn to King's men
    By Burgs in forum NSW Waratahs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-02-07, 23:43
  4. King of the Kids
    By LarryNJ in forum Public Bar
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 18-09-06, 18:55
  5. The breakdown king
    By NewsBot in forum News Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-05, 18:19

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •