9
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/down_dis.png)
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
I have it on excellent authority and am very pleased to announce that a pre-eminent Western Australian QC has accepted the coveted brief to represent RugbyWA in its litigation with the ARU.
Details are expected to be released to the public shortly.
This man has had an amazing career in the law and in Western Australian public administration.
If he can't destroy the metaphorical Indians, nobody can.
McCusker?
80 Minutes, 15 Positions, No Protection, Wanna Ruck?
Ruck Me, Maul Me, Make Me Scrum!
Education is Important, but Rugby is Importanter!
I heard something very similar
Exile
Sydney
"Pain heels. Chicks dig scars and Glory lasts forever." Shane Falco
I consider it unwise to indulge in speculation.
Patience, grasshopper.
most excellent, and to think the ARU thought this would all be wrapped up in 48-72 hours!?...
Fulvio, in your vast experience with used car sales, have you ever heard of a high profile qc taking a case as public as this one without a good chance of victory?
Im thinking these guys would be pretty good at choosing the cases they're sure they can win right?
C'mon the![]()
![]()
Malcolm McCusker according to Neddies website
http://nedlandsrugby.com.au/2017/04/...s-fight-force/
Wests Scarborough 1st Grade juggernaut has played finals rugby each and every year since its inception and continues this remarkable feat yet again this season and unbelievably it's still rolling on and as an added little circle jerk for the masses Wests actually hold the record for the current longest unbroken finals record.
Oliver Clyne to Stan Puller?:
"Well this is another fine mess you've got me into!"
Proudly Western Australian; Proudly supporting Western Australian rugby
Last edited by travelling_gerry; 19-04-17 at 16:41.
No, I've just been keeping it from you, Westie, you crusty old curmudgeon.
Think we need a different analogy. Custer lost and the Indians won.
Gigs, a barrister would most likely first provide a dispassionate opinion of the chances of success, and an intelligent client would follow that advice, or get a second opinion.
I doubt any competent barrister would accept a brief to go to trial unless there were reasonable prospects of success.