Originally Posted by
Cecilia
Hello all, looooong time lurker, first (!) time poster.
What I got out of Pulvers 'reasons' were sour grapes. Taken from the article,
RugbyWA (and its prominent supporters) was highly critical of ARU, management and board and questioned the integrity of ARU’s management processes, values and honesty.
RugbyWA publicly sought to put a “retrospective lens” on the circumstances leading up to the entry into the Alliance Agreement in 2016, including allegations of misleading and deceptive conduct by ARU which contributed to further reputational damage suffered by ARU.
Any 'reputational damage' or 'questions of integrity' are PURELY the fault of the (E)ARU and for them to, firstly, claim that and, secondly, put a dollar value on it, just screams delusion